Leland Tollett – Former Interim President & CEO Donnie Smith – President & CEO Jim Lochner – COO Dennis Leatherby – EVP & CFO Rick Greubel - Group VP & International President Ruth Ann Wisener - IR

Diane Geissler - CLSA Christine McCracken - Cleveland Research Company Ryan Oksenhendler - Bank of America/Merrill Lynch Kenneth Zaslow - BMO Capital Markets Heather Jones - BB&T Capital Markets Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Christina McGlone - Deutsche Bank Securities Ann Gurkin - Davenport & Company Farha Aslam - Stephens, Inc. Akshay Jagdale - KeyBanc Ken Goldman - JPMorgan Vincent Andrews - Morgan Stanley

Welcome and thank you for standing by. (Operator Instructions) I would like to turn the meeting over to Ruth Ann Wisener.

Good morning and thank you for joining us today for Tyson Foods’ conference call for the fourth quarter of our 2009 fiscal year. I want to remind everyone that some of the things we talk about today will include forward-looking statements. Those statements are based on our view of the world as we know it today, which could change. I encourage you to look at today’s press release for a discussion of the risks that can affect our business. First, Leland Tollett, our former interim President, and CEO will be joining us via telephone for opening remarks and then he will get back to his much-deserved vacation. Donnie Smith, our new President, and CEO will provide overall comments as well as segment reports for chicken and prepared foods. Reporting on beef and pork will be Jim Lochner, our new Chief Operating Officer, followed by the financial report from CFO, Dennis Leatherby . Also joining us on the call today are Rick Greubel, Group Vice President and International President, and Jeff Webster, Group Vice President of our Renewable Products Division. I will now turn the call over to Leland Tollett.

Thank you Ruth Ann and good morning to you this Monday morning. You saw last week’s announcement that our Board of Directors named Donnie Smith as CEO, and Jim Lochner, and COO of Tyson Foods. I am excited about these changes and I am confident about our future with these two men leading our company. I was asked last January to come back to work and to help get our company back on course and when asked how long that might take, I jokingly said I think anyhow, somewhere between three months and three years, hopefully that time will be sooner then later. Well that time is now. I really believe that I have done the job that I was asked to come back to do. We’re made tremendous progress in a relatively short period of time. All of our business segments are profitable. Our weekly numbers look pretty good and we continue to improve. I am confident that the men and women who manage the company will continue to make a positive impact as we move ahead. Donnie, Jim, and Dennis will discuss this past quarter’s results and their views of our business as we go into fiscal 2010. Thank you.

Thanks Leland, good morning everyone. As you saw in the press release excluding the beef goodwill impairment which Dennis will explain a little bit, the fourth quarter was profitable for all four operating segments. Beef, pork, and prepared foods were at or above our historical operating margin ranges. While total revenue was down in beef and pork we successfully managed the spread and they have been very profitable. Prepared foods is also doing very well with toppings, tortillas, crust, bacon and lunch meats all meeting expectations. Parts of the chicken segment are doing well now and we’re working to improve the rest of it. And to give you a quick update on our renewable products division, construction on the new dynamic fuels plant has been delayed a few weeks, but its still on budget and expected to be complete in late January with start up in early spring. We did get our EPA registration completed which is a big milestone for us. We’re happy with the rollout of Fresh Pet, our lines for refrigerated pet food, consumer acceptance is high, and new products are driving share growth. We’re in a test to rollout with most national retailers and are poised for expansion. Additionally we’re beginning test in the club store channel. Pet Treats is another exciting area for us as well. It’s a $3.4 billion category in the US and its growing about 8% a year. We see opportunities for Tyson to participate in this high margin category. To support our entry, we’re reopening an idle plant in Iowa and setting it up to produce Pet Treats. More on this in the future. Now, for details on the chicken segment, which in the fourth quarter posted an operating income of $32 million with an operating margin of 1.2%, this is an improvement over the fourth quarter of 2008 when we had a loss of $91 million and a negative 3.8% operating margin. For the 2009 fiscal year our operating income was negative $157 million and a negative 1.6% operating margin versus a loss of $118 million and a negative 1.3% margin in fiscal 2008. Volume was up 10.4% for the quarter and 8.8% for the year with sales prices remaining virtually flat. In 2009, it was a 53-week year and adjusted for the extra week, volume was up 2.7% for the quarter and 6.9% for the year. In 2008, it was a terrible year in chicken. In 2009, it was about stopping the [inaudible] and we did that and its been profitable since February. We’ve improved our live operations in areas like livability, [feed] conversion and strength, we’ve made good headway on improving G&A and the team did an outstanding job of reducing inventory. We did have a few set backs from third quarter to fourth quarter, except for wings, market prices for all chicken parts were down and grain costs were up. Our international business struggled with market volatility and cost associated with establishing the new operations. To be successful we must do a better job of marketing leg quarters too. In 2010 it will be better. But we’re still facing some challenges. We know what needs to be fixed and we know how to fix it. The issues vary from location to location but we have specific plans in place to tackle them. In general we’ve got to grow our volume, improve our return on sales, protect our cash, and keep our inventory on target. We need to fill up our plants and get better at yields, line efficiencies, and labor efficiencies. I think its important to remember that we significantly reduced inventory in 2009. So, to keep up with current domestic demand, we’ll have to produce this year what we took out of inventory last year. We’ll be doing what we should be doing which is selling what we produce and not confusing the freezer with the customer. So we’ve still got work to do and a lot to accomplish in our chicken business but I know we can do it, because we’ve already done it in our prepared foods segment. In 2009, it was one of the best years we’ve had since we’ve owned this business. Lower pork prices helped but our people turned this business around through volume gains, better asset utilization, and fewer fixed price contracts. Prepared foods had a strong performance in the fourth quarter with $39 million in operating income and a 5.3% operating margin which is a significant improvement over the fourth quarter of last year when we had a $5 million operating loss and a negative 0.7% margin. For the fiscal year prepared foods had operating income of $133 million for a 4.7% operating margin compared to $63 million and 2.3% in fiscal 2008. Average sales prices were down 8.4% for the quarter and 0.6% for the year on increased volume of 11.7% and 5.2% respectively. Now adjusting for the extra week, quarterly volume was up 4% and annual was up 3.3%. Our bacon business is doing very, very well with top line revenue up 33% in the last 12 to 18 months. We’re the leading private label lunchmeat producer in the US and that business has really turned around in the last couple of years. Going forward we believe we’ll continue to see strong results from our prepared foods segment. Raw material costs are likely to go up, but we’ve been able to move away from fixed price contracts toward to more formula pricing which should be beneficial for the fiscal year. Finally I’d like to thank our poultry and prepared foods team members for all their hard work this past year for getting these businesses on the right path to realize their full potential. Its been a great effort and I look forward to even more progress in the near future. Now I’ll turn it over to Jim Lochner, who I am very proud to have as our new COO to report on the beef and pork segments.

Thanks Donnie, I look forward to being back in Arkansas and involved in the day-to-day management of the company as a whole. Now turning to our fresh meat operating results, the beef segment made $120 million or about 4% this quarter after adjusting for the goodwill. This compares to Q4 2008’s 5.1% margin which benefited from the large mark-to-market adjustment from Q3 of 2008. There were no substantial mark-to-market adjustments between Q3 and Q4 2009. In Q4 2009 beef revenues per hundred weight and cattle prices were substantially lower then a year ago; about 15%. Our weekly capacity utilization was just over five days but 2% higher then a year ago. We continue our focus on efficiency to improve daily capacity, operating costs, and maximizing our revenue. Our total fiscal 2009 beef earnings were 2% or $214 million, roughly double the results from the fiscal 2008 after adjusting for the goodwill impairment. Beef demand and consequently revenue continues under pressure on both the cut out and the [drop] credit. Year-end slaughter volumes for fed steers and heifers were down 1.4 million head or about 5.15%, while cow slaughter increased slightly from a year ago. Looking forward in the beef segment my view of the fundamentals has not changed depreciably. We will continue to see soft demand for middles and portions of the [drop] credit items eliminate significant product price appreciation. There will be a gradual decline in available head as the beef herd continues to shrink about 1% to 2% and the diary herd reduces its size. However the placement of feeder cattle later into the summer and fall this year will provide adequate fed cattle supplies throughout the majority of our fiscal 2010. One other point we will likely see heavy carcass weights from genetic improvement and management practices continue into fiscal 2010 providing adequate supplies which may additionally limit price appreciation. We will be watching the import and export balance closely as the weak dollar compared to the majority of last year, may increase exports and limit imports lowering domestic product supplies. Our focus will continue to be on quality and customer service, maximizing revenue through mix between domestic and international sales channels, and minimizing our operating costs to manage the margins. I am very pleased with our beef team effort on these critical elements. Moving on to our pork business, the port segment had a respectable quarter coming in at $48 million or 5.5% operating margin. This compares to a strong Q4 2008 of 7.5%. Capacity utilization for the quarter came in at just over 90% compared to about 86% for Q4 2008. Revenues were down substantially compared to a year ago, nearly 25% per hundredweight. Even though hog costs decreased during the quarter they did not decrease equal to the revenue decline. For the fiscal year pork returned $160 million or 4.7% return on sales. Year over year total revenues declined dramatically largely due to decreased exports versus last year’s records and the lower drop credit. Over the year hog prices generally adjusted to the decline in revenues. Looking forward in the pork segment we will see a gradual decline in hog supplies to the first half of our fiscal year with additional year over year declines into Q3 and Q4. We expect to see fiscal 2010 hogs available for slaughter to be slightly higher then 2007 or around 107 to 108 million head. The key variable in revenue will again be export disappearance and its drivers coupled with the decreasing domestic production throughout the year. Our procurement team is closely monitoring hog supplies and availability around our plant locations. We believe we will have adequate supplies in our regions, our operations and sales team have done an excellent job in controlling cost and maximizing our revenues, which should allow us to manage margins even as supplies and capacity utilization declines through fiscal 2010. There’s really nothing new or dramatic in the beef or pork segments, just an extreme understanding and focus on details so important to running these businesses profitably. I’m very, very pleased with our teams’ efforts and results and look forward to their continued success in 2010. With that, I’ll turn it over to Dennis for financials.

Thank you Jim and good morning everyone. As stated in our press release in Q4 2009, which included 14 weeks, we reported a GAAP loss of $1.22 per share which includes a non-cash $560 million beef segment goodwill impairment charge of $1.50 per share. Excluding this impairment Q4 EPS was $0.28 per share which is a nice improvement over $0.13 per share in Q4 2008. For the fiscal year which included 53 weeks, we reported a GAAP EPS loss of $1.44 per share. Excluding the goodwill impairment fiscal 2009 EPS was $0.06 per share compared to $0.24 per share at fiscal 2008. This $560 million non-cash goodwill charge is largely a result of a fairly significant increase in our cost of capital which is used as a discount rate for goodwill valuation purposes. Our cost of capital increased from 9.3% to just over 10.1% due to the well-documented disruptions in the global economy and credit markets as they affected us and our debt spreads. Please note that this charge does not reflect our view of the beef segment’s current profitability or its future prospects in any way. In fact, as evidenced by Q4 EBIT margin of 4% before the goodwill impairment charge, our beef team did an excellent job with performance well above our normalized EBIT range of 1.5% to 3%. It also had a solid year in fiscal 2009 with a 2% EBIT margin before the goodwill charge and is well positioned for solid earnings in the years ahead as Jim described in his remarks earlier. Other items of note in our Q4 and fiscal 2009 results, grain costs. As compared to the same periods of fiscal 2008 operating results were positively impacted in the fourth quarter and 12 months of fiscal 2009 by a decrease in grain costs of $109 million and $28 million respectively. Total debt at year-end was just over $3.5 billion, an increase of around $650 million from a year ago. More importantly though, our recent efforts to reduce debt levels have been successful. Net debt at the end of fiscal 2009 was under $2.4 billion, a decrease of $280 million from a year ago. Through the end of fiscal 2009 we bought back $293 million of our bonds, although we have not made much progress recently as bond prices are pretty high. We expect we will continue to be opportunistic in purchasing bonds when they are priced reasonably. Total cash at the end of fiscal 2009 including restricted cash, was approximately $1.2 billion, an increase of over $930 million from fiscal 2008. Total liquidity including restricted cash increased to $1.9 billion. Total debt to capitalization was about 45% versus 37% at the end of fiscal 2008. On a net debt to cap basis, its about 35%. Working capital improvements continue to be a good highlight. We benefited from a strong 6.8-day reduction in inventory days or just over $500 million compared to a year ago. Also our accounts receivable improved by 1.9 days and is worth about $170 million. Obviously this working capital improvement has freed up a considerable amount of cash and it continues to position us well for the future and we expect this discipline to continue. Capital expenditures for 2009 were $368 million compared to $425 million for 2008. Diluted average shares outstanding for the quarter were 372 million. Our effective tax rate for Q4 and fiscal 2009 was negative 13% and negative 3% respectively. The effective tax rate was driven primarily by the goodwill impairment charge which is not deductible for tax purposes. Excluding the goodwill impairment the effective tax rate for Q4 and fiscal 2009, was 34% and 43% respectively. While we continue our policy of not giving guidance for 2010, here are a few items for fiscal 2010 to help you with your financial models. We expect revenues for the fiscal year to be approximately $27 billion. Weighted average shares will be approximately 378 million shares. Debt interest expense is expected to be around $320 million. Our interest expense expectation for 2010 has been impacted by a new accounting change. As a reminder, last September we issued $458 million of 3.25% convertible senior notes due in 2013. Due to a new accounting pronouncement which we will adopt in Q1 2010, we must now discount the principal balance $75 million at the beginning of fiscal 2010 and book it as equity due to the conversion feature of the notes. This amount is then amortized as interest expense over the remaining life of the notes. The impact of this change is that the effective interest rate of these convertible notes moves from 3.25% to just over 8.25% as a result of this amortization. Given the retrospective nature of this accounting pronouncement it will effectively increase fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 interest expense by approximately $17 million each when reported beginning with our Q1 results. Its important to note however that this is a non-cash charge. I’ll be happy to answer any questions about this later. I also recommend you review our 10-K which was filed this morning. Moving on, depreciation and amortization is expected to be around $475 million. Capital spending will go up compared to fiscal 2009. For the full year we expect to spend approximately $600 million. The breakdown is among three major categories. Approximately $400 million is going to be spent on current core business capital spending. Approximately $150 million will be spent on post acquisition capital spending, mostly related to our Brazil and China acquisition, and approximately $50 million will be spent related to dynamic fuels. Our effective tax rate is expected to be approximately 38%. As we all know, late fiscal 2008 and all of fiscal 2009 was marked by demand erosion, particularly in food service and export markets, higher unemployment, and changes in consumer spending patterns. In many ways this was a historic period for our company in terms of an overall turnaround. In the past 15 months we successfully raised capital twice to support foreign acquisitions, investments, and to deal with major near-term debt maturities. We completely restructured our bank debt to provide maximum operating flexibility. We generated nearly $500 million in cash through strong working capital improvements. We improved our net debt to EBITDA ratio to less then 3x from a peak of more than 5x. We improved our liquidity to more then $1.9 billion. We overcame a low stock price of $4.40 per share in face of the stock market and liquidity crisis. We handled more than $250 million of earnings hits from grain and energy derivatives. We had our second best prepared foods segment year. We had our second best pork segment year. We had our third best beef segment year and we initiated a turn around in our chicken segment, particularly after a bad 2008 first half of 2009 that we believe is poised to pay off in the years ahead. So considering all this I am proud of what we have accomplished because it has been a lot and it positions us very well for the years ahead. We have a great team here that is getting better every day. I am excited about Donnie and Jim’s new responsibilities because they are great leaders with very complimentary skills who I know will drive us to great levels of performance in the years ahead. I also want to especially thank Leland for all he did to help get us back on track and to restore our focus and confidence in what matters. Happy duck hunting season Leland, you deserve the break and you are a true Tyson hero. And lastly, thank you Tyson team members for all your hard work and sacrifice for our company. Your efforts are so greatly appreciated. With that I’ll pass it over to Donnie for closing comments.

Thanks Dennis, well we’re now about half way through the first quarter and I think 2010 is shaping up to be a pretty good year. We’re off to a pretty good start with all four segments running ahead of their projections. I would remind you however our Q1 is typically not as strong as the preceding Q4, but the fundamentals are solid and we’re steadily chipping away at the things we need to fix. We have our beef, pork and prepared foods businesses where they should be and we’re on our way to getting the chicken business there too. By focusing on operational excellence we will succeed. I’m really proud of the work everyone’s doing here and I believe our team members, our customers, and our shareholders will see the benefits in 2010 and years to come. Finally before I open the call up to questions, I too want to take this opportunity to thank Leland for all he’s done to help get our business back up on its feet. Leland has been a great mentor and a great coach to me through the years and I’m very grateful for his influence on my life. So thanks Leland, you’re a true champion and we wish you the absolute best at round two of your retirement and look forward to seeing you around the company when you stop by to check on things. We’re ready to take questions.

(Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from the line of Diane Geissler - CLSA Diane Geissler - CLSA: Congrats to the guys on their promotions, just want to ask you a question here about the grain for 2010 and appreciate the increased disclosure, but if I look at between the derivative contracts at a negative year to date for 2009, $250 million and the pick up that you saw in the fourth quarter, I guess what I’m seeing there is that you kind of moved to cash prices in the fourth quarter, so you started realizing the improvement on year over year basis. Was that $109 million that we saw in the fourth quarter, is that a good run rate to use for 2010 in terms of what you’re going to pick up year on year. How should we think about what the actual improvement in grain cost will be in the poultry division in 2010.

Its going to a little hard to predict what grain prices are going to do. I can tell you though about our philosophy. We’re going to play it pretty close to the vest on grain. If we have, and we’ve said this before, if we’ve got fixed price contracts and have the appropriate margin in those, we’ll book grain against that but other then that, we’re going to stay on the market and play this thing pretty close to the vest. So you can look at the forward curve on the futures markets, and kind of predict what the grain prices are going to look like and of course I don’t have any way to predict what the volatility will be through the year and that type of thing. Diane Geissler - CLSA: But even if we look at sort of what you’ve given us in terms of what you lost in the first part of 2009 because of your derivative book, that would suggest to me that at least for the first half of 2010 you expect grain prices, grain costs to be down in your P&L and it looks like its going to be down pretty significantly. Is that—

Yes, that’s true.

Your next question comes from the line of Christine McCracken - Cleveland Research Company Christine McCracken - Cleveland Research Company: Congratulations, I wanted to just dig a little further, I think you mentioned that you expected to see I guess the same volumes in chicken, or to increase production, I think that was kind of what you were hinting at by your comments on where inventory stood currently.

Here’s what it boils down to, in 2009 in our chicken segment we took quite a bit of inventory out and so if we just sold in 2010 what we sold in 2009, we’re going to have to produce that much more, frankly just to be able to fill the orders. So that puts us in a position to do a much better job about running our plants full and getting our line efficiencies and the type of things we’ve been looking for. Christine McCracken - Cleveland Research Company: It seems though that the way breast meat prices are today its not exceptionally supportive, are you suggesting that there’s going to be a rebound I guess in demand, is that why you’re so optimistic on rebuilding total volume.

Well I look for things to react seasonally as they should. We’ll rebound a bit after our Q1 is over and then we think there’s a pretty decent chance in Q3 and Q4 based on the pork numbers and I’ll let Jim comment on that a little bit, for demand to increase there for poultry. So I think that answers it.

I’ll add a little bit of color to this, I was very surprised on the October export numbers in both beef and pork and the interest that we’re starting to see which is going to, with decreasing production and increasing exports and probably in the case of beef, limiting imports because of the strength of the dollar, we’ll see domestic availability of protein in those two species drop going forward, unless we see a major trend change there. So that’s one reason we’ll look at the total supplies and look at the domestic availability shrinking throughout even though per capita consumption will come down, I think it will be favorable to push pricing.

Your next question comes from the line of Ryan Oksenhendler - Bank of America/Merrill Lynch Ryan Oksenhendler - Bank of America/Merrill Lynch: Can you just give us a little more color around the outlook for beef, it sounds like you have a pretty good outlook despite some weakening demand. What demand outlook do you have for next year and can you continue to manage that spread in the face of weakening demand.

Even though I think middle meats as a primary indicator are still going to be under pressure, what I just said a minute ago with the exports increasing, imports probably decreasing because of the strength of the dollar, I think we’ll start to see the overall complex of revenue come up and keep in mind that our supplies because of the way the placements were this year, should be fairly strong and not decreasing. We might see a 1% to 2% decrease in the end of the fiscal year but we’re going to have adequate supplies through the majority of the year on fed steers and heifers. So that’s why I’m fairly comfortable that we can continue on the trend that we’ve been on. Ryan Oksenhendler - Bank of America/Merrill Lynch: And the outlook for exports, I mean is that based on the weak US dollar, the exports looked pretty good for the last couple of weeks, the USDA in October, are you starting to see that in your numbers.

Yes.

Your next question comes from the line of Kenneth Zaslow - BMO Capital Markets Kenneth Zaslow - BMO Capital Markets: I’m kind of under the impression that Tyson was trying to improve the chicken operations going back last year in terms of restructuring the chicken operation to some extent to kind of be above the industry margins. The 1.2% margin seemed somewhat surprisingly low so I guess the question I have is, what actions were taken that weren’t really that successful and what actions are going to be taken forward to change the trajectory of the underlying chicken margin for Tyson.

Again, in Q4 markets were down, grains were up and we had some international start up stuff that hit that. So let me shift to the go forward deal which I think is kind of the real guts of your question, let me give you an example of something that we did through this year and I think you’ll get a feel for how that’s going to propel us on into 2010. I’m going to use an example from our small bird business which we’re very happy with that business and that’s a sector we like, in April of this past year we pinpointed and targeted some issues with that small bird business where we just weren’t going to be able to be as competitive as we needed to be. Some plants more then others, but changes needed to be made. Now I’m not going to go into a whole lot of details but by June we were getting started on the changes to that business and last week by the way, we put the final piece of equipment in the last plant on the project list, so its going to take another month or so, maybe a little bit more for us to realize that benefit of that work we were doing. But its going to be a game changer for us in our small bird business. I don’t really want to go into the exact dollar terms of what that’s going to be but there’s other changes in other segments of our business that we’re making as well, very targeted approach, facility by facility that in due time are going to pay dividends. Some might not come as quick as from June to January, but just as assuredly they’ll make the improvements that we’ve got targeted. Does that help. Kenneth Zaslow - BMO Capital Markets: A smidge, when will we see the benefits. When will we expect Tyson to be above industry margins, how’s that and I’m sorry to ask the second question.

Well, we think the back half of our year is going to be certainly an improvement over the first. I will tell you this, we are in Agri Stats, and we’ve talked about those numbers a little bit, during our Q3 and our Q4, we were hanging around about average, give or take a little bit in operations profit per live pound for both of those quarters. Starting in October, November we’re doing better then that. Got to keep reminding you there’s three holidays in this quarter but once we get past that, we believe that our line efficiencies and labor efficiencies are going to improve in quarters two, three, and four.

Your next question comes from the line of Heather Jones - BB&T Capital Markets Heather Jones - BB&T Capital Markets: Going back to the chicken results because they were disappointing relative to my estimate as well, I was wondering if you could give us a specific example of these issues you mentioned or a dollar amount around the start up costs in international, the volatility and when those showed up and when they’re going to be resolved.

Okay, I’ll give you a couple of things. We had had in our business an issue with frankly some dried broth powder, and I’m getting pretty specific here, I don’t want to make a habit of doing this on the call, we were looking for avenues during Q3 to be able to find an appropriate home for that. It had been in inventory for quite some time and frankly just didn’t work out. So in Q4 we wrote that off and we had a few things like that so that’s an example. But more specifically during Q4 we were starting up about 22 cone lines in our small bird business and going to more hand deboning. It takes a while for you to hire a work force, get them trained, and get them up to speed, and I tell you in Q4 we had a very disappointing boneless, skinless breast to live yield in that quarter. Not just in the small bird group but in other groups as well. Its those type things that we’re aggressively working on improving now seeing good progress and those are the type of things that will carry us through the rest of 2010. Heather Jones - BB&T Capital Markets: So when you said that in Q3 and Q4 you were close to average in Agri Stats, are you separating out these disappointing yields and this dry broth issue to get to that average performance.

No ma’am, that’s straight up. And let me let Rick comment a little bit on this international deal because that was a pretty good piece of it too.

In Brazil we had a number of things go on there that were negative to the business, one was that for the year the real has strengthened about 35% versus the US dollar and in Q4 alone it was over 12% of appreciation and at the same time the export markets, which are about half of our businesses, our production is exported out of Brazil. They have not come back and I’m speaking specifically here about boneless, skinless breast meat going to Europe, or boneless thigh meat going to Japan, so traditionally Brazil has been able as an industry to do a real good job of raising prices in dollars whenever the real appreciated. And we did not see that throughout Q4. Things are a little better today then they were in October but they’re still not where they need to be. Additionally we had about five or six new cone lines going in Brazil as we continued to expand our production and we are still operating at less then full capacity there. So when you’re producing at less then full capacity, your costs are rising because of the currency and the export markets haven’t returned, you got a number of challenges that you’re facing and that was a big piece of it. Heather Jones - BB&T Capital Markets: Still we should expect better domestic chicken results going forward but it sounds like the international piece is going to be a drag for a while.

I think what we have to see in international is a couple of things, one is we’ve got to get our capacities up so that we’re taking care of those variances, and I know we’re going to get better in our production as our people get experience on those lines. And then number two, we need to see the pricing improve relative to the currency in Brazil, we don’t see anything that indicates that the real is going to weaken so it really means that we’ve got to see demand come back in those export markets.

Your next question comes from the line of Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse: To get your, I think your comment was that you have to produce this year what you took out of inventory last year in chicken, does that mean that your production would be up 5% this year.

No, it does not. It wouldn’t be five. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse: And just a clarification, you’re talking about 22 cone lines in small bird, is that part of the small bird restructuring that you did or are you increasing small bird production as a result of these 22 cone lines or just shifting things around.

Its part of the restructuring and it was part of the change in the mix to be able to get a mix that would be profitable out of those plants. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse: And maybe you could talk a little bit more about international, Tyson has never had a lot of experience operating in emerging markets, this is really their first foray of significance, maybe you just give us a little more clarity here, will these results be profitable in the next year or do you really need exports to improve and you really need the currency to be better in order for them to be profitable and can they be profitable even if those elements are still weak.

I think they can be profitable if we recover, we’ve got to fill up the production and eliminate those variances and that’s the decision that we wrestle with every day is as long as these export markets continue to be weak and the currency continues to be strong, how fast do you want to expand your production. And I’m not going to go into more detail on that but I wanted to give you a feel for the decisions that we have in front of us. And Mexico has been another challenge, it’s in a severe recession right now, GDP is down 7% for the year, unemployment 13%, demand has softened significantly, exports from the US to Mexico were up putting more pressure, so you’re in an over supply situation even though the industry has cut back production about 4%. Operationally we are a lot better in Mexico then we were a year ago, but when you’re in an over supply situation due to reduced demand, it is a difficult market situation. And China is better, in China we don’t have a demand issue, we are increasing production there. We’ve got strong GDP growth, and it looks like the food service industry is just chugging along well and we are a big supplier into that market segment so I would say we feel a lot better about China then I would say Mexico and Brazil right now. Robert Moskow - Credit Suisse: I haven’t read the proxy yet, but just one last question, I remember Dick Bond had a big incentive clause based on operating income in any given year, is that going to be a major piece of your incentive.

Actually the comp committee of the Board is working on my incentive package and I’m, that’s about all I, I don’t want to sound like Forrest Gump here, that’s really all I have to say about that right now.

Your next question comes from the line of Christina McGlone - Deutsche Bank Securities Christina McGlone - Deutsche Bank Securities: I was wondering just following on Christine McCracken’s line of questioning, it looks like fresh meat is starting to stabilize and leg quarter demand has picked up, so I’m curious is demand recovering or do you see any kind of temporary increase because of trying to get in under the Russian quota or a switch to boneless wings and you noted an increase in production or that you want to fill up your plants, I’m just curious what is your utilization running at and what’s the target.

Great series of questions there, I’ll try to remember them all. As far as demand goes, here’s what we see, overall and I’m going to just kind of forward look into 2010, it looks like to us overall protein supplies domestically are going to be down. [Pullet] placements have remained stable with the [inaudible] place numbers where they are, it looks like to us that this thing is not going to get too carried away. Demand is not great but 2010 versus 2009 is not going to be near as bad as 2009 was versus 2008, so we’ve got in front of us a decent manageable balance. Now with what we’ve done to take the inventory out of the system, it gives us the opportunity to be able to produce more without necessarily selling more. Now I’m not saying that we’re not going to grow sales, because with our run rate, we certainly will, we want to help grow our customers’ business, that’s always our focus. But we don’t have to sell more in 2010 to produce more in 2010 because we’ve taken all this product out of inventory. So I think in the front end of our plants, we’ll be bumping up towards a very high 90’s utilization number. We’ve still got lots of latent capacity in our business on the FP side which is not a bad story because that means we can continue to grow our business without a lot of capital requirements. So hope that answered everything if I caught it right. Christina McGlone - Deutsche Bank Securities: The only thing, just about boneless picking up and export demand picking up.

I’ll tell you, we have seen boneless prices increase $0.04 a pound the week before Thanksgiving, I don’t remember that. So I don’t know what that portends for the future and we’ll take this thing as it comes but if we’re right on what we think about the overall domestic supplies, with what Jim says driven by the export in beef and pork, we feel like we’ve got a pretty good shot in 2010 of seeing some pretty decent pricing, but we’ll take that as it comes. Our focus right now is on operational excellence and our folks are focused on getting our cost structure where it needs to be.

Your next question comes from the line of Ann Gurkin - Davenport & Company Ann Gurkin - Davenport & Company: I wanted to ask you about prepared foods, can you still stay within the targeted 4% to 6% operating margin range for all of 2010 even if input prices go up.

I believe we can, yes ma’am. Ann Gurkin - Davenport & Company: And what percentage of your business is now shorter-term in contract.

If we go back a couple of years ago, something short of 50% of our business in, wait a minute, are you talking about chicken or prepared. Ann Gurkin - Davenport & Company: Prepared foods.

In prepared we have very, very little fixed price contracts, most everything we’ve got is on a formula or a matrix, so very little fixed price.

Your next question comes from the line of Farha Aslam - Stephens, Inc. Farha Aslam - Stephens, Inc.: Congratulations first of all, when you look at your chicken restructuring, do you have numbers, about how much you’re targeting saving in fiscal 2010 and the timing of when those savings will come.

No, I really don’t want to get into the details of that. I think it will, certainly its going to play itself out in our numbers because for the first time I can actually see our plan execution in our results so we’re, as we talked about where we see 2010 going, that restructuring and the things we’re doing around operational excellence will be what gets us there. Farha Aslam - Stephens, Inc.: And right now your chicken division is kind of average for the industry and a lot of the industry is right now running in the red, so can we expect sort of fiscal first quarter earnings for the chicken division to be in the red and kind of progress to positive seasonality as the year flows.

No I don’t think you should. I don’t want to get into giving guidance and that kind of thing, but we’re off to a very good start, we’re ahead of plan. The first six or seven weeks of our quarter is off to a good start. I don’t see us being negative, no.

Your next question comes from the line of Akshay Jagdale - KeyBanc Akshay Jagdale - KeyBanc: Congratulations on the appointments, just one quick one on chicken, in terms of again I think a lot of people asked about your performance relative to the industry which was much weaker from what we see, sequentially I think you’re the only chicken company that we follow that saw a major decline in the September quarter from a margin standpoint, can you just help us understand that. What in your business other then international would cause a sequential decline in margins.

Okay so we talked about the international piece of it, markets were down, our grain costs were up, there were several one-off things that we did whether it’s the dry broth powder deal I mentioned or there’s a few other type things like that, that added up in the quarter. Those things plus the issues we have around how during our restructuring it just takes a little time for the operational improvements to happen while you’re staffing lines and doing those type things. Those were the things that caused the dip from three to four. Akshay Jagdale - KeyBanc: If you look at your pork and prepared foods and you look at where futures are for hogs today, I think they were pointing to about $8.00 increase on a live basis I think for next year, can you just comment on what you think the futures imply. Do you believe in that, is it too optimistic, you’ve said in your prepared remarks that you think there’s going to be enough supply then the supply reduction will accelerate in the back half, but it seems like from everything you said, you still expect utilization levels to be pretty high. So maybe you could just talk about utilization levels and give us a sense of whether you think futures are too optimistic or not.

Futures prices should reflect total revenue increases which I am optimistic will increase based on the comments I made particularly with stimulation of exports and a decreasing supply and even through October it appeared that the demand for, or domestic pricing, or demand for domestic pork increased. And then if you really roll back and look we came off the peak year of 2008 and 2009 was down slightly and we’ll still be above 2007 and we were able, that was, we haven’t materially changed the structure of the industry compared to 2007. So that’s the basis behind my optimism in being able to manage through the margin with increasing revenues and the supplies not decreasing dramatically, but down.

Your next question comes from the line of Ken Goldman - JPMorgan Ken Goldman - JPMorgan: My question in on your statement that you believe chicken demand will go up in the back half of the year. You know you’re not the only company out there to be talking about an improved back half of, I know your fiscal 2010 is different then calendar but it seems like the back half is going to be a for a lot of companies this wonderful recovery period, and I just don’t quite understand where the data is that would lead people to think that the consumer is going to suddenly be better then. I’m not questioning what you’re saying, I’m just hoping to get some kind of clarity on where that statement is coming from and maybe some confidence in some data behind that.

I can tell you what’s behind it, number one its seasonal. Right, I mean three and four are always better then one and two in the chicken side of the deal. Number two we think there’s a chance for the economy to improve or whatever, now, we don’t necessarily have to have that because we believe there’s going to be a limited supply of overall protein in the US in the back half of the year. So if there is no economic recovery, I don’t think that [allays] our optimism about chicken demand a bit, and I don’t think we’re talking about an overwhelming demand. If you look at the USDA’s number, they’ve got chicken production up about 1% in 2010, that seems reasonable to me. So really that’s kind of what we’re talking about. Ken Goldman - JPMorgan: You know, you’ve forgotten more about chicken then I’ll ever know, but 1% seems light to me. Given what you are talking about today and who knows what Pilgrim’s Pride is going to do but they’re going to be recapitalized and going to have a very different outlook and different take and then a year from now you’re going to have, I know its not next year, but a year from now you’re going to have Sanderson Farms coming online with Kingston so 1% seems fairly conservative to me. Does it not seem conservative to you?

I don’t know how the industry is going to respond to all of the things that will come down the road between now and then, but I can tell you we have got ourselves in a position that we’ve been wanting to be in for a long time to where as we grow our business with our customers, we’re in the position to either produce it or buy it, depending on which is more opportunistic for us. I like that position. So if demand comes into the chicken segment from a reduce in overall protein, seasonal, whatever, we’re positioned well to take advantage of it. And also probably ought to let Rick have a comment or two about this.

There’s about a least we track about 30 years worth of data that clearly shows that protein consumption and GDP are highly correlated. This year’s global GDP growth is slightly positive driven mainly by China and India with the developing world all being negative. Most of the forecast for next year is that the developing world goes positive, maybe not anything super strong, but positive and the developing world probably continues to be relatively strong. Chicken also is your most economical protein and the most accessible. So we think based on better GDP growth and the economics around chicken affordability, we’re going to see stronger global demand. And I think most of the people that look at this are all predicting that as well.

Your next question comes from the line of Vincent Andrews - Morgan Stanley Vincent Andrews - Morgan Stanley: My question would just have to do with trying to better understand, let’s assume the economy does recover next year, and you’re right and chicken demand does increase, in your plan and in the conversation that you had with us this morning, in that scenario do you also assume that oil and grain prices and everything else are going to move up with that demand or are you sort of expecting status quo of futures curves in that regard.

Basically what we do is we look at the forward curves in the futures markets and of course we know what the basis in freight is doing as well and we can plot daily of course, what our forward grain cost position is going to be so we’re assuming the forward grain cost based on the forward curve of the futures markets today. Vincent Andrews - Morgan Stanley: Okay so in other words this economic recovery that would come in the second half of next year is already baked into the corn futures curve, but its not baked into chicken prices right now, is that right?

I would think you could draw that scenario. I think the futures curves are on the base commodities do have that built in and I think the lag will be the things we’ve been talking about that we’re starting to see this interest in export disappearance which will start to limit domestic availability of all proteins in addition to the production declines in pork and then followed by beef. And so that’s why the optimism of being able to push the price on the reduced overall supplies there and the input costs we think have that baked into it at this point in time.

The other comment would be that grain prices in the futures are not just dependent on economic recovery, they also take into account ending stocks and planning intentions.

Your final question is a follow-up from the line of Christine McCracken - Cleveland Research Company Christine McCracken - Cleveland Research Company: I just had one follow-up question on a comment made by Jim, I think you said that you expect a fairly tight cattle supply but for overall supply to be made up by heavier weights, and I guess I’m a little bit surprised by that given some of the things that you have been working on to move towards smaller fed cattle and then secondly we’ve had a really sharp drop off here in the last three, four weeks in weights and I was wondering how that lines up with your comments relative to weight.

Good question because if we think in terms that the cowherd is declining and the dairy herd is declining, so we’ve pushed placements back later into the year heavier placement weights. And that gives us a more favorable supply through the majority of our fiscal 2010. In my rationale even though the weights have dramatically dropped off in the last two weeks down to the five year average, it’s the placement weight component and the feed cost and the different management to maximize the efficiency of gain that I think will keep the carcass weights. And ideally I’d love carcass weights to stay where they’ve been and the standard deviation of the weight variance to drop, that’s the best overall scenario for us and the rest of the beef Industry. But I don’t think we’re going to see a major trend change down to lighter weight carcasses.

Thank you very much for your interest in the company and attending the call today and we look forward to speaking with you next quarter.