TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

$8.19
0.03 (0.37%)
New York Stock Exchange
USD, US
Asset Management

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) Q3 2018 Earnings Call Transcript

Published at 2018-10-31 23:57:06
Executives
Andrew Olson - Chief Financial Officer Jim Labe - Chief Executive Officer and Chairman Sajal Srivastava - President and Chief Investment Officer
Analysts
Ryan Lynch - KBW Casey Alexander - Compass Point Fin O'Shea - Wells Fargo Christopher Nolan - Ladenburg Thalmann
Operator
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the TriplePoint Venture Growth’s Third Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] This conference call is being recorded and a replay of the call will be available as an audio webcast on the TriplePoint Venture Growth website. I would now like to turn the call over to Andrew Olson, Chief Financial Officer of TriplePoint Venture Growth. Mr. Olson, please go ahead.
Andrew Olson
Thank you, operator and thank you everyone for joining us today. We are pleased to share with you our results for the third quarter 2018. Here with me are Jim Labe, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board and Sajal Srivastava, President and Chief Investment Officer. Before I turn the call over to Jim, I would like to direct your attention to the customary Safe Harbor disclosure in our press release regarding forward-looking statements. And remind you that during this call, we may make certain statements that relate to future events or the company’s future performance or financial condition, which maybe considered forward-looking statements under federal securities law. We ask that you refer to our most recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these statements. We do not undertake any obligation to update our forward-looking statements or projections unless required by law. To obtain copies of our latest SEC filings, please visit the company’s website at tpvg.com. And with that, I will turn it over to Jim.
Jim Labe
Thanks, Andrew and good afternoon. Last quarter, I told you we were on a 2018 role, while now we are on a 2018 tariff. We are delivering on the 2018 plans and goals that we set out at the beginning of the year. We are accelerating towards a strong finish to 2018 we have been talking about in all these earnings calls. We are on the path to closing out what we believe will be an exceptional year of performance. Our year-to-date accomplishments already include hitting some new income and originations records. We have also had IPOs or acquisitions at several of our portfolio companies and we raised additional capital for substantial deployment for both year end and 2019 opportunities. The trade winds are all blowing in our direction, favorable venture capital market conditions, the highest originations pipeline we have had since our IPO and a strong rate and billing momentum in signing up new business. Our year-to-date performance continues to demonstrate the return potential of our unique venture lending model. The model has also proven the benefit of and our access to and providing debt financing to successful and innovative high-growth companies backed by our select venture capital leading investors not only here in the U.S., but also in Europe. I am really proud of this quarter’s accomplishments. Here are some of the highlights I would like to share with you. Once again, we hit a new quarterly record for investment income. This is the second consecutive quarter we have achieved the record for quarterly investment income. This brings us to more than $46 million in investment income year-to-date. We also earned record net investment income or NII during the quarter. In fact, we have generated a record total NII for the first three quarters of this year. We have also increased our net asset value per share again for the third consecutive quarter. During the quarter, we generated a very attractive portfolio yield, a 19.3% weighted average annualized portfolio yield at origination during the quarter. We believe are on track to again achieve what we accomplished last year as well attending the highest portfolio yield among the venture lending BDCs. We continue to experience IPOs and acquisitions at our portfolio companies and had another portfolio company complete its IPO this quarter. During the quarter, FarFetch completed its very successful and a very high profile IPO raising more than $850 million. Amazon also completed its acquisition of our portfolio company PillPack. Based on some of the publicly announced fundraising activity and many of the published articles out there and some of our other portfolio companies, we expect to see more successful exits coming. There were also a few repayments this quarter which is to be expected. This is a given with the exceptionally high quality and growth profile of our technology companies. And as we have said we expect customer prepayments to continue as part of each quarter’s activity as well. These prepayments are not only testimonials to the quality of our portfolio, but also big contributors to the high portfolio yield and record levels of investment income. I am also pleased to announce that our sponsor TriplePoint Capital was named the 2018 Specialist Lender of the Year at the Investors All-Stars Awards Ceremony in London. TriplePoint was 1 of only 7 finalists for the award. The award was judged based on commitment to the industry and driving it forward. The number and value of loans originated and notable loans made in the impact of involvement in the industry. I believe this award demonstrates not only TriplePoint’s global reach, but also its prominence in the venture lending marketplace. While it’s one thing to share all these records and achievements, they are all now on the past and behind us. I’d say the two most exciting quarterly developments for last. These developments further reinforce why we believe we are on the path to a strong finish for 2018 and very bullish on our business heading into 2019. The first achievement is ending the quarter with $204 million of signed term sheets at Venture Growth stage companies. This is a strong indication of the demand in our market and demonstrates the strength of our originations team and the TriplePoint platform. It further reinforces the direction we believe we are headed for ending this year and getting a jumpstart into 2019. We are not experiencing any downward pressure on terms or any downward pressure on our originations. Some venture lenders are winning deals on that basis were not affected and continue to maintain our standards which you can see in our resulting yields. The second big accomplishment last quarter was raising an additional $95 million in equity. This included $5 million in the form of a private placement from both Colony Capital and Goldman Sachs Asset Management, or GSAM and $90 million in the form of a public offering. This provides us with the fuel and firepower necessary for the increased originations pipeline and demand heading into 2019. There is no lack of deal flow or demand for debt financing. The demand in fact has only continued to increase every single quarter since the beginning of 2017. To summarize as I always say, we will stick toward netting an exercise or investment discipline. This is while our industry leading yield profile, our strong credit quality, a quality of Venture Growth stage companies in our pipeline and the activity in progress among our portfolio companies speaks for itself. We expect to once again this year achieve earnings in excess of our dividend. If you can’t tell, we are on track to a strong finish to 2018 well underway and what we foresee a really robust outlook heading into 2019. It’s really nice to sit here and to be able to repeatedly use phrases such as record this or record that when we are reporting quarterly earnings. We have the team, the capital, the pipeline and the reputation and track record complete for us heading into an outstanding year. Our aspirations and planning ambitions are also to turn 2019 into another remarkable year. With that, I will now turn the call over to Sajal.
Sajal Srivastava
Thank you, Jim and good afternoon everyone, In Q3, TriplePoint Capital signed approximately $204 million of term sheets reflecting particularly strong market demand and we closed $63 million of debt commitments with 6 companies with 5 new to the portfolio. We ended the quarter with $242 million of unfunded commitments. I will talk more about unfunded commitments in a moment. On a year-to-date basis, we have signed $562 million of term sheets and closed $320 million of debt and equity investments. As you can see, we have significant backlog already going into Q4. With respect to new companies added to the portfolio in the quarter, the first I would like to discuss is Enjoy, which is a provider of the personal e-commerce platform designed to change the way people buy and experience electronic products and gadgets. Enjoy is led by Ron Johnson, the former CEO of JCPenney and former Senior Vice President of Retail Operations at Apple, where he pioneered the concept of the Apple retail store and the Genius Bar. Enjoy has raised more than $80 million of equity capital from Andreessen Horowitz, Kleiner Perkins, Highland Capital Oak Investment Partners and others. Factual is a provider of a location data platform designed to maximize data accuracy, transparency and accessibility. Factual has raised more than $100 million of equity capital from Andreessen Horowitz, Index Ventures, Upfront Ventures and others. Hired is a provider of a marketplace for recruiting software engineers. The company’s platform offers a curated marketplace that matches engineers, product managers, data scientists, web developers and sales professionals with technology companies. Hired has raised more than $130 million of equity capital from Comcast Ventures, Crosslink Capital, Lumia Capital and the Ontario Pension Board and others. Passport Labs is a developer of a parking and transportation management platform designed to centralize as well as control parking and transit systems. Passport has raised more than $60 million of equity capital from Bain Capital Ventures and others. Camsville Play is a gaming company that aims to create a new play movement to unleash the boundaries of the screen from mobile devices, including iPads and Amazon Fires, with the launch of its inaugural product Osmo. Osmo expands the playing field and engages creative thinking and social interaction allowing any object to interact with the digital device. Camsville Play has raised approximately $40 million of equity capital from Accel Partners, Upfront Ventures and others. Overall, during Q3, we funded $53 million of debt investments to 8 companies, $250,000 of equity in one company in acquired warrants and valued at 900,009 companies. On a year-to-date basis, we have funded $145 million of debt and equity investments to 19 companies. As you may have seen in today’s earnings release so far here in Q4, we have closed $65 million of new debt investments and already funded $55 million of new investments. During Q3, we also had $93 million of prepayments, which help push our portfolio yield to 19.3%. Excluding the impact of prepayments, our portfolio was 14%, which was up slightly from 13.9% last quarter. Moving on to credit quality as of September 30, the weighted average internal credit rating of the debt investment portfolio with 2.09 as compared to 1.92 at the end of the prior quarter. As a reminder, under our rating system, loans are rated from 1 to 5 with 1 being the strongest credit rating and new loans are initially generally rated 2. During the quarter, we removed $91 million of loans from categories 1 and 2 due to prepays. We added $43 million of new loans to Category 2, upgraded 2 customers with a combined principal balance of $20 million from Category 2 to Category 1 and downgraded one customer with the principal balance of $6.7 million from Category 3 to Category 4. During the quarter, PillPack closed its sale to Amazon for $1 billion resulting in a $1 million realized gain for us. FarFetch successfully closed its initial public offering resulting in over $3 million of additional unrealized gain for us based on its closing price and several portfolio companies raised additional capital as well. We continue to see strong demand and have a robust pipeline of near-term opportunities. Our unfunded commitments totaled $242 million to 15 companies, of which $72 million is dependent upon the company’s reaching milestones. Almost 80% of our fundings this quarter came from last quarter’s unfunded commitments and 50% of our fundings on a year-to-date basis has come from unfunded commitments. As we have said in the past, unfunded commitments show how hard at work we are and our great visibility into near-term portfolio growth. As we said at the beginning of the year, our highest priority in 2018 is to capitalize on the strong demand for Venture Growth stage lending and grow the company from an exceptional, but small cap BDC to a larger and more diversified BDC. We are very proud of our progress to-date. In particular, our equity raise which was above our net asset value, our co-investment approval and our shareholder approval of lower asset coverage will enable us to grow, while meeting the strong demand signed term sheets and backlog in the form of unfunded commitments we have today and expect to see in the near-term. On top of that, we have made substantial progress on diversifying our portfolio and some of our larger customer concentrations. Since Q1, we have rotated out of three of our top five positions, thanks to acquisitions, prepays and co-investments generating significant additional income in the process. Given our strong performance to-date, our taxable earnings are on track for the second year in a row to exceed our distributions. We continue to be thoughtful about the impact of our continued portfolio growth, prepays and our exceptional portfolio yield as well as the benefits of higher leverage but have kept our quarterly distribution at $0.36 and will evaluate based on our outlook and progress. Another area of focus for us is on the Investor Relations front. We are pleased with added research coverage again in Q4 bringing us to four new analysts in 2018. We are also focused on ways to engage with existing and new institutional and retail investors domestically and in Europe, Canada and Asia. Here in Q4, we have participated so far in one non-deal roadshow and are coordinating additional ones for 2018 and early 2019 as well. We won’t likely speak until the next year, so we would like to thank our investors and partners for their support and our team for the strong results thus far in 2018. We are excited for what’s in store for 2019. I will now turn the call over to Andrew to highlight some of the key financial metrics achieved during the quarter.
Andrew Olson
Thanks, Sajal. I am pleased to report the financial results for the third quarter 2018. As mentioned by Jim and Sajal, we ended the quarter with record investment, NAV appreciation, net investment income in excess of our dividend, positive portfolio company exit activity driving realized gains and a well-positioned balance sheet for future portfolio growth. The robust performance was achieved through measured portfolio fundings coupled with a healthy recycling of our investment portfolio as a result of portfolio company M&A activity. Total investment and other income was up 7% to $17.7 million or $0.82 per share for the third quarter of 2018 compared to $16.6 million or $0.93 per share for the second quarter of 2018. Our investment portfolio generated a weighted average portfolio yield of 19.3%, including prepayments and other activity during the quarter and 14% without. This is compared to the equally exceptional 17.2% and 13.9% in Q2 2018. The increase in total investment income relative to the prior quarter was primarily due to higher prepayment and other income related to portfolio turnover and a increase in recurring portfolio income is mainly due to the cumulative rise in the benchmark interest rates. Net investment income for the quarter was up 14% to $10 million or $0.46 per share compared to $8.8 million or $0.50 per share in the second quarter of 2018. Expenses during the quarter were generally flat relative to the prior quarter at $7.7 million consisting of interest and fee expense of $2.1 million, base management fee of $1.8 billion, income incentive fee of $2.5 billion and administrative and general expenses of $1.2 million. We recognize net realized gains of $900,000 or $0.04 per share in the third quarter of 2018 from disposition of investments in two companies bringing year-to-date net realized gains to $1.7 million or $0.09 per share. We had net change in unrealized depreciation during the quarter of 5,000 or $0.00 per share consisting of the reversal of previously recognized net unrealized appreciation into net realized gains of $1.5 million offset by mark-to-market appreciation of $1.5 million on the investment portfolio. The above activity resulted in a net increase and net assets for the quarter of $10.9 million or $0.50 per share compared to $8.4 million or $0.47 per share in the prior quarter bringing year-to-date net income to $27.2 million or $1.43 per share nearly topping our annual dividend of $1.44 per share and three quarters worth of work. During the quarter, we generated a return on average equity of 14.8% and return on average assets of 10.5% on an annualized basis. We also generated a return on average equity of 14.3% and return on average assets of 9.1% for the 9 months ended September 30, 2018 annualized. Now, turning to the balance sheet, we funded $53.6 million of debt and equity investments to 9 companies during the quarter and had 4 companies repay our outstanding obligations prior to maturity in the amount of $91 million, one company repaid its outstanding obligations at maturity in the amount of $5 million and we have principal amortization on the remaining portfolio of $7 million. All told, we ended the quarter with long-term investments of $351 million or down slightly from the prior quarter. At quarter end, we held 128 investments in 49 companies with a cost in fair value of approximately $352 million. The company’s debt portfolios ended the quarter with a cost of $333 million of which 53% carry floating rates. Our unfunded commitments totaled $242 million to 15 companies, of which 72 million is dependent upon the company’s reaching milestones. Of the total commitments outstanding, $26 million will expire in 2018, $146 million will expire in 2019, and $70 million will expire in 2020 prior to expiration. During the quarter, the company raised $94.6 million of net proceeds from the issuance of 6.9 million shares of common stock in a public offering and concurrent private placement at a price of $13.70 per share. As part of the offering, the advisor paid approximately $3 million of underwriting fees and discounts. Proceeds from the capital activity who used to offset borrowing costs in the short-term but are intended to fund long-term investment growth in the coming quarters. Any excess liquidity used to purchase short-term investments in the form of T-bills, were excluded from the base management fee calculation. We ended the quarter with total liquidity of $274 million consisting of cash of $14 million, net short-term investments of $50 million and $210 million of undrawn availability on our revolving credit facility. Total outstanding borrowings as of quarter end were approximately $75 million of long-term fixed rate notes at a cost of 5.75% and nothing drawn under our revolving credit facility giving us a leverage ratio of 22%. We ended the quarter with net assets of $336 million of $13.59 per share. This is up $0.14 from $13.45 per share in the prior quarter and at NAV, our annualized dividend yield generates nearly 11%. With that, I am pleased to announce for the fourth quarter of 2018, our Board of Directors declared a distribution of $0.36 per share payable on December 14 to stockholders of record as of November 30. This marks the 19th consecutive quarter we have increased or maintained our quarterly distribution rate. And with that, I will turn it over to Jim for some closing remarks.
Jim Labe
Thanks, again Andrew. At this point, we will be happy to take any of your questions. Operator, could you please open the line?
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Ryan Lynch with KBW. Please go ahead, Ryan.
Ryan Lynch
Hey, good afternoon guys and nice quarter posted. First question on the unfunded commitments, if I look at the end of Q2, you guys had unfunded commitments of about $203 million and then in the third quarter, you funded about $53 million, so you guys had closed or had about 25% I guess closing rate from those unfunded commitments. If I look at the end of the third quarter, you guys had unfunded commitments of about $242 million, you have already closed or funded $55 million of new investments in the fourth quarter. So, you guys are having a much higher close rate of over 50% so far. Can you just talk about what is driving the high funding as a percentage of unfunded commitments so far in the fourth quarter?
Sajal Srivastava
Sure. Ryan, I will start and then Andrew please jump in. So, I would say kind of they are not actually correlated. So as I mentioned during my of the script. So of the fundings we had in Q3, roughly 70% were from prior quarter’s unfunded commitments and so typically what happens is the fundings in a quarter are not generally from that quarter’s close commitments that are from prior quarter’s close commitments or prior quarter’s unfunded commitments. And so I would say again generally speaking, the fundings for example that we have had in Q4 were not related to the commitments we had in Q4 more related to utilization of the Q3 unfunded commitments if that makes sense. There are some companies which do draw close, but the majority of them do not generally draw close, because of their liquidity positions, the strong liquidity positions.
Ryan Lynch
Right, right. It was just that from the unfunded commitments in Q3, you guys had such strong closing so far in Q4, it was much stronger than in prior quarters. So I was just wondering if there was any reason behind that?
Sajal Srivastava
Yes, I think it’s a little bit of timing. So, the fundings in Q3 were I guess slightly low $53 million from our perspective and so it’s more and then we had only a month into Q4 of $55 million, so I would say a fair amount of that was stuff that should have funded in Q3, but it happened here in Q4 and we are busy in expecting a strong Q4.
Andrew Olson
It just tends to be a timing thing as Sajal said and these companies aren’t anticipating their fundings based on a particular quarter end.
Ryan Lynch
Okay. And then I might have missed this if you have said it, but did you guys give any color I know you did last quarter on – for the fourth quarter quarter-to-date, any sort of color on prepayments or potential prepayment fees, I know you guys gave the funding numbers, but I was wondering what you guys had potentially coming back so far?
Sajal Srivastava
Yes. I think we have always said generally we expect one prepaid quarter and to the extent that some of them are related to acquisitions like we had with PillPack and Ring that happened post quarter, we give guidance on it, but there is nothing that we can give guidance on at this time for Q4 other than we as Jim said expect on generally at least one prepay a quarter.
Ryan Lynch
Okay, so nothing unusual then so far. As far as the third quarter, I just wanted to get your kind of thought process on the timing of the equity raised you guys did in the third quarter, you guys obviously had net repayments this quarter, some really nice repayments, drove a lot of fee income and drove really strong earnings quarter in the third quarter no doubt, but with the visibility you guys had into the strong repayments in the third quarter, can you talk about why was the equity raise done in the third quarter given you guys were actually receiving a lot of capital back, what was thought process for raising more during that time period?
Sajal Srivastava
Yes, I mean it’s how strong in the demand in our reputation primarily pipeline, Ryan. So as Jim talked about during his section, the pipeline is the biggest it’s ever been since the IPO of TPVG and we are expecting a particularly strong finish for 2018 and that backlog into 2019 as well. And so from our perspective, the bigger goal of growing TPVG based on customer and market demand and so that was our perspective and that was the rationale is our ability to grow and candidly if you look since that event, we have put $100 million of work with the fundings in Q3 and the fundings here in Q4 so far. And we are far from done for the quarter. And so I think it’s long-term sustained growth in our business in pipeline. I think we are on track to close between $200 million to 300 million of term sheets a quarter. And so in order to continue to do that and continue to fund that pipeline, we need more equity capital plus the benefits of the lower asset coverage and the co-investment.
Jim Labe
We need to be poised and plan for this demand in the future. You can’t raise capital after the fact.
Sajal Srivastava
Plus with the $240 million of unfunded commitments, I mean the good news is that’s near-term visibility on where that equity capital is going to be deployed. Plus as we said that generally 50% to 70% of that actually gets utilized again is quick near term growth potential for us.
Ryan Lynch
Okay, it makes sense. And then just one final one, Jim, I think you mentioned in your prepared comments that as far as fundings and commitments right going to the market today that you guys are seeing no downward pressure on terms for the deals you’re doing are really – even maybe pricing. Can you just maybe explain that a little bit more, I mean, it’s a pretty note, definitely a competitive environment in the middle market, I know there is lot of VC lenders out there as well. Can you just explain why you guys are not seeing really pressure on pricing in terms?
Jim Labe
Yes. It’s a completely different market in my understanding of the middle market. There aren’t agents, brokers, syndications, clubbing, multiple bids. This is a very specialized market. And what really prevails in terms of selection is not price, its reputation, references, relationships, track record, experienced team. This is a very specialized business, it’s high barriers for others, the due diligence, the understanding of these companies working with only the top select venture investors and having the reputation and long-standing relationships with them count. We haven't seen any change on the competitive landscape. As we always talk every quarter about some venture lender this or that, but no change at all. And again for TriplePoint, this is not about price, it’s not how we ever have marketed and when there is some competition, we’re winning at a premium.
Sajal Srivastava
Yes. I would only add I think it’s a testament to our team and the quality and the hard work of differentiating of really meeting the needs. I mean, we provide a very bespoke financing product. We take the time as a lender to really understand our portfolio companies’ needs and structure a very unique financing for that, and I think they're willing to pay us a premium for it.
Ryan Lynch
Okay. That makes sense. I – those are all the questions for me. I appreciate the time this afternoon.
Sajal Srivastava
Great. Thanks, Ryan.
Operator
Our next question comes from Casey Alexander with Compass Point. Please go ahead, Casey.
Casey Alexander
Yes. Good afternoon. I guess after seven questions I think you probably got most of mine. Can you indulge me by detailing for me each of the prepays during the quarter, as well as the $5 million loan that matured, who they were and how much each one was please?
Andrew Olson
Yes. So, we had Rent The Runway I think was our largest prepayment during the quarter. That one I think was about $45 million in total in terms of principal. In addition, we had $20 million to BlueVine, which we paid during the quarter and that was just not their entire outstanding obligation.
Sajal Srivastava
They closed an equity around during –
Andrew Olson
Yes. So, it was just a portion of their total outstanding. We had PillPack, which had funded and closed during the – had funded and prepaid during the quarter, part of it was just to get them through to the acquisition and that was $25 million, and then RetailNext was $8 million.
Casey Alexander
RetailNext, didn’t that – that was $8 million?
Andrew Olson
Correct.
Casey Alexander
And that one just went on the books, didn't it?
Andrew Olson
I think it was two quarters ago that was funded, I don't recall exactly the funding date.
Casey Alexander
And what was the $5 million loan that matured and was paid off?
Andrew Olson
It was WorldRemit.
Casey Alexander
WorldRemit. And do you have any loans maturing in this quarter?
Andrew Olson
I don't recall –
Sajal Srivastava
We have another WorldRemit loan that was returned.
Andrew Olson
Yes. nothing of meaningful size.
Casey Alexander
Okay. Alright. That's all my questions. Thank you.
Sajal Srivastava
Thanks, Casey.
Operator
Our next question comes from Fin O'Shea with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead, Fin. Fin O'Shea: Hi guys, thanks for taking my question. Just looking at the new investments this quarter, there are six new names. Can you kind of describe the degree of co-investment across platform now that you have obviously co-exemptive relief, and then I can kind of tack Part B to that question on as well. Is there given there's a bit of a lag in payment and funding, are we seeing this impact yet, and would that be holding back new fundings at this time still?
Sajal Srivastava
Sure, Fin, this is Sajal, I’ll start, and was glad to catch up with you out West when you came to visit us early in the quarter. So, for the fundings in the quarter, I think as I said earlier that roughly 70% were from existing prior unfunded commitment. And so none of the fundings in the quarter were co-investment or had co-investments associated with them because we only got that late in Q1. So, you wouldn't necessarily quickly see the impact of that. We probably expect that potentially in Q4 and future quarters. So, I’d say no impact from co-invest likely in the future. I would think we would spin it a little differently. Again we view that as actually a benefit to TPVG given the – again we’re seeing strong demand, we’re seeing the opportunity and it’s actually to one of the strengths of our platform is that customers, some customers, the more robust ones do want larger financing. And so having co-investment allows us to take advantage and allocate across the platform and address portfolio diversification and concentration of which again as I mentioned we rotated out three of our top five. So, we only expect the co-investment to benefit TPVG on a go-forward basis, not hurt it from a fundings perspective. Fin O'Shea: Yes. It is sort of what I was getting and I was sort of – should we expect a stronger level of fundings given a more seasoned and diverse eventually commitment-based versus the more lumpy sole TPVG one previously?
Sajal Srivastava
Fair point, yes, correct, and I’ll come back. Yes, absolutely. Fin O'Shea: Okay, very well. And then sort of high-level for VC fundraising, which has obviously continued to be very robust. You guys are – take the position and this is very helpful in terms of demand for your capital despite being a bit of a competitor to equity. Is there a bit of a lag in terms of or if so how much of a lag in terms of VC fundraising and demand for late-stage growth in the context of late-stage to VC obviously fundraising?
Sajal Srivastava
Yes, maybe I’ll start and then Jim you can jump in. So Fin as we look to VC fundraising, we think that's a barometer for the long-term outlook for our business because typically when these funds raise new funds, those funds have investment period between two to five years. And so that shows great, I think Sequoia just raised $8 billion, and so that's not $8 billion, I got to all invest today that’s $8 billion theoretically over the next two to five years, and so that's what gives us given the record level of fundraising really strong confidence in terms of the long-term outlook for our business as a whole. Now as we look to your question of more near-term indicators of our outlook, we would say the rate of VC investment activity and so that’s them actually deploying that capital that not only that they’ve just raised, but prior capital that they have raised as well. And so that's an important indicator for near-term portfolio opportunities for us, right. Those companies that have now just raised equity capital represents venture growth stage lending opportunities for us in the next six to 12 months assuming those are later our growth stage companies. And to the extent those are early stage companies as part of the TriplePoint Capital fund system and lifespan approach, we would expect those companies to turn into grow up across the chasm, move along our football field, and approach the red zone into the four years.
Jim Labe
I can’t add too much that other than just a reminder that we are very highly selectively focused in terms of venture capital funds, backing our portfolio companies and it’s a relatively as a select set of what we consider the top venture capital investors. There is no lack of fundraising, no lack of money they’re putting to work and you see we had an all-time high for originations. So, the demand is strong among the companies being backed by this Group. And to your competitive versus equity comment, we really see ourselves as do our investors, who bring us in these fields more as a supplement to earn enhancement to the equity cover – to the equity dollars. Fin O'Shea: Thank you for that color and congratulations on the quarter, guys.
Jim Labe
Thanks Fin.
Operator
Our next question comes from Christopher Nolan with Ladenburg Thalmann. Please go ahead, Chris.
Christopher Nolan
Hey guys. Has any of the trade tensions with China sort of affected the space that you guys operated at all and that’s sort of our team question, but it seems…
Jim Labe
Yes, Chris, that’s a very interesting question. We have not seen it from a customer perspective in the sense that our portfolio companies are missing out on selling to international companies. What we have seen are some companies unable to raise equity capital from Chinese investors and so because of CFIUS and other limitations and so the good or bad is that there are other – these companies attract global investors and so to the extent that they can raise it from Chinese strategics, they can raise it from other global or international strategics. So we have not seen a material impact other than again some companies that were interested in partnerships with Chinese investors were unable to do so.
Christopher Nolan
And then Jim as a follow-up turning to the balance sheet, I mean, obviously you raised all the equity capital kudos above NAV, paid down the revolver. What were you thinking in terms of growth in the balance sheet for the fourth quarter into the first half of ‘19 are you looking to use the revolver for most of that or raise debt, I mean just give us little guidance if you have any?
Jim Labe
Yes, I am obviously going to turn the balance over to Andrew who is going to be our organizer and manager of that, but at the end of the day we do have this strong demand. We are going to be working on continue and diversify the portfolio, use capital wisely, but also put it to work in some real what we think is going to be good growing numbers in portfolio here heading into 2019.
Andrew Olson
Yes, I will just touch on it quickly. I think overall our strategy is we will continue to deploy the capital that’s on balance sheet, use the credit facilities, but we would look to probably lever up the balance sheet in 2019 as opposed to tapped equity markets.
Sajal Srivastava
And then obviously prepayments, we do expect the continued pace of at least on a quarter and so when that capital comes back we would expect to deploy that into funding new investment as well.
Christopher Nolan
Got it. Final question, in terms of dividend on a reported basis, you guys are covering the dividend quite handily on a cash basis I assume you guys are doing that as well, congratulations. But you are so under-levered right now and you are covering the dividend, I mean going forward as you start to lever up and the earnings go up, what’s your thinking on the dividend will be a supplemental or just increase the base?
Andrew Olson
Yes. I mean, I think overall these are conversations where we have with our board ultimately. They are the ones who determine the dividend rate and the distribution timing, but overall, yes very good, it’s good to have those conversations, those are things that were engaged with our board members and I don’t think there is a conclusion yet, but a good problem for us to have.
Christopher Nolan
Okay, thanks for taking my question guys.
Jim Labe
Thanks, Chris.
Operator
This concludes this afternoon’s question-and-answer session. I will turn the call over to Jim Labe for some closing remarks.
Jim Labe
I will close again by expressing my appreciation to all of you for your continued interest and support in TriplePoint Venture Growth. Today I guess I should also say happy Halloween to everyone and thank you all again for participating. We will talk to you soon.
Operator
This concludes today’s call. You may now disconnect.