Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. At this time, we would like to welcome everyone to SABESP's Conference Call to discuss its results for the third quarter of 2018. The audio for this conference is being broadcast simultaneously through the Internet on the website, www.sabesp.com.br where you can also find the slideshow presentation available for download. [Operator Instructions] Before proceeding, let me mention that forward-looking statements are being made under the Safe Harbor of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1996. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of SABESP's management and on information currently available to the company. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions because they relate to future events and, therefore, depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Investors should understand that general economic conditions, industry conditions and other operating factors could also affect the future results of SABESP and could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Today, with us, we have Rui Affonso, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations; Mario Arruda Sampaio, Head of Capital Market and Investor Relations; Sylvio Xavier, Head of Costs and Tariffs; and Marcelo Miyagui, Head of Accounting. Now I'll turn the conference over to Mario Sampaio. Sir, you may begin your conference.

Thank you. Good afternoon, everybody. This is our third quarter conference call. Let's go through the results and presenting you update and comment on certain relevant matters. This is a five-slide presentation. So let's start on Slide 3. Here we can see that the company's billed water and sewage volume presented a stable performance with an increase of 0.1% this third quarter, 0.2% of which from water and 0.1% related to sewage. In this scenario, we like to highlight the decrease in the billed volume from the industrial, commercial and public sectors. Let's now go to Slide 4, go through the financial results. In the third quarter of ’18, the company recorded net income of BRL 565.2 million against BRL 900.5 million in third quarter '17. The main change in the third quarter of 2018 compared with the same period last year was the exchange rate variation. Third quarter of '18, SABESP recorded a foreign exchange loss of BRL 100.8 million, driven by the depreciation of the real against the dollar and the yen versus a foreign exchange gain of BRL 253 million in the same period last year, and this leading to a negative variation of BRL 444 million between the period. Gross operating revenue related directly to sanitation service, which does not include construction revenue, increased by BRL 331.9 million or 11.1% from BRL 3 billion in the third quarter of '17 to BRL 3.3 billion this quarter. Revenue was influenced by 9% increase, which effects started to kick in in November '17, and also by a 3.5% tariff repositioning index that was the final tariff revision with effect starting June 2018. It was also a negative impact on revenue from the higher recognition of estimated loss with doubtful accounts related to wholesale sales in third quarter '18 in the amount of BRL 42.7 million. This is deriving mainly from the municipality of Guarulhos. And for net operating revenue, which includes the construction revenue, there was a increase of 7.8% or BRL 274.3 million. Costs, including costs, selling and administrative expenses and construction cost rose 13% in the third quarter of '18. As a result of these variations, adjusted EBITDA reached BRL 1.4 billion, that's 1.5% less than the BRL 1.45 billion recorded in the same period last year. The adjusted EBITDA margin stood at 37.6% in the third quarter of '18 versus 41.2% in the third quarter of '17. For the last 12 months, this margin reached 36.9%. If we exclude construction revenues and costs, the adjusted EBITDA margin came to 46% in the third quarter of '18 versus 50.9% third quarter '17. Let's now move to Slide 5. Let's comment on the main variations of costs for the quarter. As we mentioned in the previous slides, costs, selling and administrative expenses and construction costs increased BRL 13 million, or 13%. If we exclude construction cost, selling and administrative expenses and cost increased BRL 299.9 million or 17.5%. The main variations responsible for this result were: General materials with a gain of 53.3%; services with an increase of 27.1%; and electricity with an increase of 18.6%; general expenses raising 17.5%; and salaries, payroll changes and pension obligations with an increment of 11%. For more detailed explanation of our cost please refer to our earnings release and call us if you need. On Slide 6, let's move, we show the main variations that affected our net income in the third quarter of '18 compared to third quarter of '17. Net income totaled BRL 565.2 million, net operating revenue climbed BRL 274.3 million. Cost and expenses, including construction cost, rose BRL 313 million. Other operating revenues and expenses, including equity equivalents, recorded a positive variation of BRL 18.9 million. Financial expenses moved up BRL 485.7 million, and finally, income tax and social contribution declined BRL 107.5 million. That's due to the lower-taxable income recorded in the third quarter of '18, mainly impacted by the [appreciation] of the dollar and the yen against the real. Obviously when compared to the devaluation, which took place in the third quarter of '17. Let's go to next slide, our last slide. That's coming on the situation of reservoirs in the Metro region of São Paulo. The '17, '18 hydrological year that ended last September recorded lower than average rainfall and water inflow. The '18, '19 hydrological year that began this October reservoir levels that's when they usually recover, specifically between October and March. This is where we should be able to us see recovery of rapid water levels. As you can see, we have to keep close to rainfall and average water inflow. This October, and particularly, we saw above average rainfall in the reservoirs that supply the São Paulo Metro region, and we have close to an above water inflow. At the end of October, reservoirs were operating at 44.7% of their capacity. That's equivalent to 869 million cubic meters of stored water, including the volumes stored in the São Lourenço system. Remember, this is the new system that came into operation at the beginning of this year, and it's now the ninth supply system as that is part of the São Paulo water Metropolitan system. We would like to remind you, once again, that thanks to the initiative undertaken by the company to increase water security, and reduce water losses this combined with a reduction in consumption by a relevant part of the population. We understand that the stored water volume today is more than sufficient to meet demand in the Metro regions, as we move on throughout this year and next year. Done with the slides. We have comments we would like to make with you, points we would like to go through related to two subjects. The first one is related to the Provisional Measure 844 and the second related to ARSESP's recently disclosed regulatory agenda. Starting with the provisional measure, let's go back and remind us that it was initially presented in July this year, later approved by the special commission that amended the original text. That was in October 31 and at the same time, transformed the provisional measure into a conversion bill November 28, 2018. Today the text that is on discussion still needs to be approved in plenary session of the House of Representatives and the federal Senate, and it's important to note that if not, it will lose effect as of December 19, so that's the due date for final approval by both houses of congress. Now if approved, the new legislation will come into force on the publication date, except for article 10 A to be included in law or sanitation Law 11445, in this case, which will enter into force 18 months after the publication date. The provisional measure, let's continue calling it provisional measure, changes dozens of articles of three laws that make up the legal framework for the sanitation sector. That's mainly changes at some point of Law 9984 of the year 2000, Law 10768 of 2003, and 11445 of the year of 2007. According to the text, one of the first actions set forth in the provisional measure aims to formalize the different norms for the sanitation sector. In order to accomplish this, the measure defines the national water agency in Brazil. It’s A-N-A, ANA. There is possibility for creating reference standards to regulate the sector. This means that ANA, among others, will establish directives norms to regulate the provision of public basic sanitation service, as well as service quality and efficiency standards, including progressive reduction of water loss. ANA will also be in charge for setting standards for the regulation of tariffs and the stabilization of the negotiation instruments for the provision of sanitation services. It's worth noting that the standards to be introduced will be practically mandatory, given that the concession holder and service provider that fail to comply with the standard issued by ANA will not have access to federal public funds, financing using federal funds or funds operated by federal public government entities and body. In our specific case, this means an impact or access – potentially access to [NDF] and the social bank funding we call here Caixa Econômica. Another very controversial issue is the fact that the provisional measure makes obligatory municipality meeting public call to receive proposals for the provision of basic sanitation service, before delegating the provision of sanitation services to state-owned companies such as SABESP, which in case would be waived from taking. In addition to this, the [indiscernible] conversion or the provisional measure provided that municipalities should hear the responsible body for regulation, in our case ARSESP, at which we will do a supervising before publishing the public call noted. So it's one more step to secure any contract. It's also worth noting that before the publication of this provisional measure, in other words before this proposal, the municipal governments had the option to sign the cooperation agreement with the state government and a program contract with a state company, such as us. We doubt the need for a bidding process, where then a bid will only be required in case the owner of the concession, which is to hire a private company, which is not clear yet in the text of the provisional measure that the assumption of services by private companies and municipalities currently operated by state companies, such as SABESP, with another private company will have – will be preceded by higher payments of compensation or identity for investments not advertised. This legal gap in fact will allow numerous litigation for misappropriation of investments and public assets, affecting both state-owned and privately controlled companies – all this – which all – obviously does not contribute to the legal security of the sector, which we all know it's essential for the attraction of investments. After that, let's go to the second point, comment on the regulatory agenda. On November 1, we issued K notice to the market related to the opening buyers of the public consultation. In this case, the number is 09/2018, focused on receiving inputs and opinions related to the proposal for our SABESP regulatory agenda for the next two years; that is for '19 and '20. The purpose of this initiative was the regulator to ensure transparency and the participation of the society in the regulatory process and to the users of regulated public services, economic agents and other stakeholders the opportunity to express their opinion, as well as to obtain subsidy to provide greater reliability, clarity and security in the decision-making process of the agency. The company understands that this process will be very positive, but it will bring more credibility actions that will be taken by the regulator, minimizing delays as has already occurred in the last revision besides ensuring a broad participation in the regulatory process and eventually anticipating relevant discussion points. It should be noted that the agenda proposed includes a matter of great interest to the company, which is the need to review our tariff structure, a recurring subject not tackled during the first and second ordinary tariff revisions, or remember that our current tariffs structure is from the 1970s. As such, it certainly needed an updating, and it's very relevant for our business. According to their published agenda, their objective is to define the new tariff structure and respective implementation plan, all this the completion expected for the first half of 2020. Something also important for the first half of 2019, has set intent to establish the methodology and general criteria for declining SABESP regulatory assets remuneration base, relative now to the third tariff review process. Also no less important is the water discussion for which SABESP intends to improve the methodologies adopted before the end of the first half of 2020. Also the implementation of the project of the general quality index, known here the two factors, is foreseen for the second half of 2020 in order to comply with the methodology, which is already established by SABESP second-tariff review. In other words, the two factors is established but has not yet been implemented. To conclude this topic, we see this initiative as very positive for the process and SABESP. And for us, we will certainly as usual we will be an active participant. We will send our contribution on several subjects and interests of the company. Well this ends the presentation and our comments. Now we will open for the question-and-answer session.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Snehal Amin with WindAcre. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. I was curious what was happening on the expense side. The expenses went up a lot and are growing faster than revenue. So what's happening there, and what is the plan to be more disciplined on the expense growth going forward?

Snehal, just a second here.

Hi. This is Miyagui. To talk about the service expenses, if you consider the last three quarters, the average in these account. You can see this price expenses we have an average of [306,000]. So it's not so different from this quarter. But if you compare the third quarter '17 to the third quarter '18, you can see the difference, but not so different than the operating in the last three quarters. And if you consider the materials, also we have in the last two quarters, the average of about [55,000] or [5 million] in this quarter, we had [61], it's not very different. But if you compare it with the third quarter, you can see this big difference. To talk about Q2 specific account, Mario can continue about this.

Yes. I think you also see pension fund payment, health fund – health and service. Just make sure now the service plan is responsible for the pension plan and for the health plan. What has happened and we're in the process is that, there was an imbalance in the health plan provided that the health costs are rising much rapidly than the contributions made by employees to the health plan, provided that the contributions to the health plan, they are just by our salaries, basically. And in anywhere in the world, health costs are going very high. So to balance that, we have to complement and make a payment, which is hopefully a one-time payment, and the reason is that at the same time, we have made a decision that SABESP will not be an independent manager of the health plan. We took that away from them, and now we put out a bidding process, where in this bidding process, we're going to hire a third-party health provider and management firm, one of the big ones. This will certainly bring us more control and visibility on managing the expenses in the health plan, and how that impact potentially SABESP. We will, in fact, have a small but reduced ongoing recurrent, which is part transfer of funds to support the pension funds as a benefit, but this is coming down. So net-net, I think we can say that the expenses increased in this line based on this one-time. And our expectation is that this will not be recurrent, and essentially it will be slightly lower as we move on, if we succeed in what we're doing. I think those are the big ones.

How big was the one-time expense?

BRL 44 million.

BRL 44 million in this quarter, okay, and then just two other questions. One, is there any update on [RSSP] and your challenge of the tariff? And then second, is there any update on reaching a resolution with Guarulhos on what they owe you?

Okay. Let me tell you, that tariff, if you remember there were two points. There was – we questioned how they estimated three parts of the process. Based on conversations with them we expect anytime soon they putting out their final opinion. So anytime soon, we would be surprised if this drags even more. Related to the administrative request, this is – we're in the same place we spoke last time. We're obviously keeping track of time, and at some point, if there's no answer, we will, as we already mentioned to you, take formal action. Okay? Related to Guarulhos, we are on track with the steps that are required to achieve the contract. We can tell you we have been in very intense discussions and conversations. We are very ahead in the process of choosing a final contract and condition. The law – the municipal law, which authorizes the executive, the mayor to sign the contract has been approved. But the fund, the municipal fund, that as much as in the same time – in the same time, I mean, in the same way that we have in São Paulo the fund that will receive a transfer has been approved. In other words, we have a full legislative approved; we and the city to make the move. Part of this process is the signature of an agreement between the city and the state where they stay together will delegate to SABESP, the service. Plus in this process both we'll make a SABESP point of SaaS as a regulator. This should be signed in the hour, right now, still today. We have already commented this. So I think we're pretty much on track. There is obviously an interest in doing this as soon as possible from the mayor point of view and from our point of view. So I think these are potential good deals coming in front of us, okay?

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thanks.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Michael Gaugler with Janney Montgomery Scott. Please go ahead.

Good morning everyone.

Good morning Michael. Long time?

Just two questions. The first, back in June, you canceled the debenture offering and I'm wondering have conditions improved to a point where you could try to access the markets again in the near future?

Okay. Yes, we did cancel the – at the time, we – the conditions that were offered were good. They slightly deteriorated as we approached the book building. So we turned back on the banks and said, no thank you. That's going to be a slight change. We didn't want to validate this. So we on the same time – at the same time, we managed to anticipate approximately $100 million from IBD, which obviously supported our cash. As you can see, say from third quarter numbers, we actually have a very strong cash availability. So to that extent, we found not necessary to move on and keep on with that debenture. We will obviously at some time come back to that, but not now. The market picked up a little bit now after the election, as you can see also the stocks how they're doing. There's a lot of liquidity in Brazil, so you won't see any liquidity issues for debt refinancing. In the international market we just had a meeting today with the bank. It is getting cheaper despite treasuries going up, which means spreads dissolving and to risk the best, we're going down. So Michael, that's the [indiscernible].

Okay. Then just one other since you mentioned – since the election, the recent political changes and then if you think about Provisional Measure 844 as well, and if that passes, does it impact your strategic plans going forward? Perhaps as it relates to capital structure or investments?

Well, just a second. Just a second, Michael.

Hi Michael, it's Rui. We really cannot see any with exception the specific, 10-A act of this provision measure. We cannot foresee any big issue for SABESP. Basically, if it's implemented like it is right now, related to ANA or to establish the conditions of the rules for a regulation framework in Brazil, that doesn't affect directly SABESP. It's more to provide guides for other companies, other keys and departments, water departments for the municipalities that does not count with the SKUs of SABESP. So is nothing that will affect directly SABESP. And the market in Brazil is very excited, positively excited with this general framework on the regulatory side for water and sanitation. So we cannot see in this – we have our preference, but we don't foresee as a big issue for SABESP in this case. The only point that could affect us, is that there is some – how can I say uncertainty, it's not very clear. The 10.8 article that indicated – that established that in the case that a tariff entity would – municipality, for instance, would like to make contract program, concession would first have to ask everybody, which means the private sector, if they have the intention to participate. If there is a case, they have to go through a bidding process. So we don't disagree with that. It is okay for us to go for competition. We're ready for it, but with the condition to be very clear that the assets that are not amortized has to be previously paid by the new concessionaire. That's the only point. Otherwise, you undermine the property rights. That's not good for SABESP, and it is not good for the private sector in our opinion also. That's the only point that we see that will get clearly negative in these provisional measures. You now understand it. If how explained it is not clear, that's best or not, but it's spending. There still remain few days to be approved. If not, let's see in 2019.

All right. Well, thank you gentlemen. That is all I have.

Okay. Thanks Michael.

[Operator Instructions] There appears to be no further questions. Now I'll turn the conference back to SABESP for their final remarks.

Okay, thank you very much for your time, and see you next year. But everyday, here, myself and Angela, we're available for questions, doubts and et cetera. Thank you.

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.