Good day, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Insteel Industries fourth quarter 2010 conference call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct the question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this conference may be recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today Mr. H. O. Woltz III, Insteel President and CEO. Sir, please go ahead. H. O. Woltz III: Thank you, Karen. Good morning. Thank you for your interest in Insteel and welcome to our fourth quarter 2010 conference call which will be conducted by Mike Gazmarian, our Vice President, CFO and Treasurer and me. Before we begin, let me remind you that some of the comments made in our presentation are considered to be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risk factors are described in our periodic filings with the SEC. I will now turn it over to Mike to review our fourth quarter financial results then follow up to comment more on market conditions and our business outlook.

Thank you H. As we reported earlier this morning, Insteel incurred a loss from continuing operation of $1.7 million or $0.09 a share for the quarter compared with earnings from continuing operation of $2.8 million or $0.16 a share for the same period last year. The loss for the quarter includes pre-tax charges totalling one $1.9 million or $0.06 a share after tax for inventory write-downs and the settlement of litigation. $0.4 million or $0.01 a share after tax was related to inventory write-down to reduce the carrying value of inventory associated with our standard welded wire reinforcement product line to the lower cost to market as a result of competitive pricing pressures. The other $1.5 million or $0.05 a share after tax for the settlement of the litigation matter that has been discussed in our SEC filings on an ongoing basis dating back to fiscal year 2008. We are pleased to have as a matter of results which will serve to eliminate the associated legal fees that we have been incurring and restore the commercial relationship with this customer going forward. Excluding these charges, the loss from continuing operations for the quarter would have been $0.03 a share. In addition to these charges are results for the quarter are unfavourably impacted by lower shipment and compressed spread between selling prices in raw material cost which were driven by the continuation of weak market conditions. Net sales for the fourth quarter were down 8% from the prior year due a 13.8% decrease in shipment which is partially offset by a 6.7% increase in average selling prices. On a sequential basis, net sales were down 9.2% from the third quarter on a 7.5% decrease in shipments and 2% decrease in average selling prices. Gross profit for the fourth quarter fell to $2.3 million from $7.7 million in the third quarter and $9 million in the prior year with gross margins dropping to 4.2% in net sales from 12.4% in the third quarter and 14.8% in the prior year. Gross profit for the current year quarter includes the $0.4 million charge for inventory write-down that I alluded to you earlier. The year-over-year reduction in gross profit for the quarter, which is primarily driven by the narrowing and spread between average selling prices and raw material costs and to a lesser extent the decrease in shipment. Our total unit production for the fourth quarter was down 22% from last year and 6% on a sequential basis from Q3which reduced overall capacity utilization to 49% from 52% in the third quarter and 56% a year ago. SG&A expense for the fourth quarter decreased $0.3 million from the prior year, primarily due to the reductions in legal and consulting expenses a large portion of which were related to the fees that we were incurring a year ago associated with the PC strand and trade cases. Interest expense for the fourth quarter decreased to $42,000 from $157,000 a year ago due to reduced standardization of capitalized financing costs resulting from the June 2010 amendment over our credit facility. Our effective income tax rate on continuing operations for the fourth quarter decreased to 41.9% from 43% a year ago primarily due to changes in permanent book versus tax differences. Going forward our effective tax rate will be subject to change depending upon the level of future earnings which could secure the impact of permanent differences or as there are adjustments to any of the estimates that enter into our tax provision calculation. Moving to the cash flow statement and balance sheet, continuing operating activities used $1.6 million of cash for the fourth quarter or providing $15.5 million in the prior year quarter, primarily due to the year-over-year changes in net working capital together with the loss that was incurred during the current year quarter. Net working capital used $1.6 million of cash during the current year quarter while providing $8.3 million in the prior year quarter largely due to the $8.4 million increase in payables from Q3 to Q4 last year. Accounts receivable decreased $3.5 million during quarter due to the sequential reductions in shipments and average selling prices, as well as the slight decrease in our day's sales outstanding. Q4 inventories were up $2.1 million from the third quarter, due to 4.9% increase in units on flat average unit values. Based on our forecasted run rate for Q1, which has historically been our seasonal low point from a volume stand point our inventory position at the end of the year represented about 3.5 months of shipments. Accounts payable and accrued expenses were down $2.8 million from Q3 primarily due to lower raw material purchases and accrued income taxes. Capital expenditures for the fourth quarter declined from the prior year to $0.2 million bringing the total year to $1.5 compared with $2.4 million in 2009. Looking forward, we expect CapEx for fiscal 2011 to come in at less than $5 million. Investing activities of discontinued operations are reflected on our cash flow statement reflects $2.4 million in net proceeds from the sale of our idle Virginia facility previously associated with our industrial wire business which was completed during the quarter. We did not repurchase any shares of our stock during the fourth quarter under a $25 million share repurchase authorization. Going forward, we will continue to be opportunistic in repurchasing shares based on our business outlook and cash flow expectations while maintaining ample borrowing capacity and financial flexibility to capitalize on any growth opportunities that may arise. We ended the quarter debt free with $45.9 million of cash and cash equivalents or about 261per share, up $1.8 million from Q3 and $10.8 million from a year ago. As we move into fiscal 2011, the primarily macro indicators for the construction sector point to continued weakness particularly in commercial construction until a more pronounced recovery in the economy and then a job market begins to take hold. Considering our highly competitive cost structure and our strong balance sheet, we believe we are well-positioned to navigate our way through this challenging business environment and capitalize on any growth opportunities that may develop. I will now turn the call back over to H. H. O. Woltz III: Thank you, Mike. I want to focus my comments on current market conditions, our outlook for demand over the next few quarters and developments in our raw material markets. As we discussed on the conference call last quarter, heightened competitive pricing activity had begun to adversely impact margins across each of Insteel’s product lines. We mentioned that those trends were likely to continue and draw our fourth quarter further depressing margins in view of Insteel’s commitment to keep its customers competitive in an environment of increasing chaotic pricing behaviour by competitors. Those concerns proved to be well-founded as reflected in our fourth quarter results that we released today. Spreads between selling prices and raw material costs have reached levels that have severely impacted the operating results of our industry and are likely to challenge the survival of less cost-effective or more highly leveraged producers. In fact, as reflected in today’s earnings release, we have seen some fall out of higher cost competitors that had not invested in their facilities and presumably elected to close the doors rather than incur continued operating losses. While these exits from the market illustrate the harsh competitive environment that exists the elimination of these standard welded wire reinforcing competitors is not expected to have a significant market impact for the immediate future just given the depressed level of demand. Nonetheless, it is encouraging to see some initial indications that market forces are spurring a reconciliation of supply and demand. The primary challenge we continue to face is simply a lack of demand for our products driven by an economy that it is at best stuck in neutral with historically low levels of consumption of welded wire enforcing and PC strand. Employment growth is marginal. Economic and patch policies are unfathomable creating enormous uncertainty in undermining the eventual recovery of the private sector. As Mike mentioned in his comments, Insteel operated at only 49% of capacity for the fourth fiscal quarter as compared to 56% in the fourth quarter of 2009. The comparison is particularly sobering when you consider that Q4 normally benefits from strong positive seasonal forces and that Q4 last year was extremely weak. Needless to say at this point we see no indications of a near term recovery in demand. Turning to our raw material markets after significant price escalation between January and June, softening demand for wire rod and declining steel’s scrap prices have tempered pricing expectations through the remainder of the calendar year. As we have learned over last few years however wire rod prices correlate closely with changes in the steels scrap market which is subject to abrupt changes of momentum based on a broad array of factors that extend well beyond just domestic supply and demand. Considering the high degree of uncertainty and in-demand for our products together with unfavorable seasonal trends, we plan to reduce our inventory position over the next few months. You may recall that we reported in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 that two-wire rod production facilities representing approximately 20% of domestic capacity were suspending operations. Our New Jersey facility was slated to close permanently and the facility in South Carolina was being idled indefinitely, while the permanent closure of the New Jersey facility is complete. Recently there have been reports that the South Carolina facility will resume operations early on 2011. We have had a long history of purchasing from this facility which is well-situated relative to our North Carolina, Tennessee and Florida manufacturing plants and a resumption of operations would be a positive development for Insteel. Finally, I want to mention that subsequent to the end of the fourth fiscal quarter, we resolved litigation with the customer that had been pending for almost three years. In addition to eliminating the on-going litigation cost, the risk of an [adversity] verdict and a significant on-going distraction for the company, we believe the resolution of this matter will lead to resumption of commercial relations between our companies which would clearly be a favorable development given the current market environment. We don’t expect to generate shipping volumes immediately that would be material to Insteel’s overall performance but overtime we expect to restore this relationship to the important position that it occupied prior to the disagreement that resulted in a commercial hiatus in view of the likely continuation of weak market conditions, we’ll focus our efforts on minimizing cash operating costs, maintaining our market share and preserving our financial flexibility so we’re able to pursue any attractive growth opportunities that may arise during this down term. This concludes our prepared remarks and we will now take your questions. Karen, would you explain the procedure for asking questions.

Certainly. (Operator Instructions) And we do have a question from the line of Robert Kelly of Sidoti.

Good morning, H, Mike. H. O. Woltz III: Good morning, Bob. Michael C. Gazmarian: Good morning, Bob.

I just have a question. You talked about the intensifying pricing pressures in the release, but on a sequential basis average pricing only down 2%. Could you just kind of reconcile what is going on there? Michael C. Gazmarian: Well, pricing – competitive pricing activity is at a high level. Of course when we talked about pricing and the impact on Insteel’s profitability, it also goes to the question of spreads between wire rod costs and selling prices and the spreads have clearly narrowed on edge. Some of the high raw material costs from earlier in the year is going to cost the sales at a time when competitors have elected not only not to seek to recover high raw material cost in the market but to in fact reduce selling prices so the impact on spreads is what’s really driving the poor results.

Alright, but the selling price is held pretty firm sequentially. I mean and you have kind of worked through a big portion of your high cost raw material. Should we expect spreads to stay stable for the next couple of quarter or do you expect pricing competition to take prices at another let down? H. O. Woltz III: Well, clearly the competitive pricing pressure continues. We will know only month to month what happens on transaction prices for wire rods at this point. It is not something that we can forecast but let me just say that to sum it up we feel margin pressure.

Understood. Can you talk about the size and the scope of the closures you saw that have come out on the release and you know what… H. O. Woltz III: I think more they are indicative of market conditions rather than of themselves being a great substance. Both of the producers were reasonably small producing between 25,000 tons and 35,000 tons per year. They both focused solely on standard welded wire enforcing products and from our knowledge both were fairly antiquated facilities from an operating point of view.

Part of your efforts to match the lower industry pricing list with SEC some of this call it invalidation. I mean is this the strategy for the next or for the first day of the future? H. O. Woltz III: I think what is really driving Insteel’s commercial policies right now is that our customers expect that we keep them competitive in the market that is increasingly chaotic. We are going to do that. You may recall from prior quarters we indicated that we have made what we have considered to be a valiant effort to recover high raw material prices in the market place and we hang out there for weeks as we watch competitors undercut us and indicate that they are really more interested in doing that so here we are. We are not going to lose our market share. We are going to keep our customers competitive and we are going to just to wait for some recovery or some change in market conditions.

And then finally, end of the year was almost $46 million in cash on the balance sheet. How do you think about use this for cash especially with – it seems like some of your quarter (inaudible) growth opportunities are not going to be surviving much longer? What are your opportunities for (NYSEARCA:MNA) and things like that as far as uses for cash? H. O. Woltz III: Well, let me say first we feel awfully good about having it on balance sheet at this point in view of the hostile environment that we are operating in. We are, as Mike pointed out, extremely well positioned to capitalize on opportunities and we are looking and you know I do not think that we can say more than we are just interested and we are proactive so we are hopeful that something positive emerges from what is a pretty dismal environment.

What are your thoughts on as far as returning it to share holders at this point in the game? H. O. Woltz III: Well, I think we have a pretty good record of doing that Bob. It would take an assessment by the company and the board that given all circumstances it was the right thing to do to either recommence share repurchases or look at another special dividend of some type. We are constantly evaluating that and it remains a high priority for us.

Thanks, guys. H. O. Woltz III: Thank you, Bob.

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) Our next question comes from the line of Tim Hayes of Davenport and Company

Good morning, H. O. Woltz III: Good morning, Tim. Michael C. Gazmarian: Good morning, Tim.

Just one question, Mike. Could you repeat the year over year changes for pricing and shipment, please? Michael C. Gazmarian: Sure. On a year-over-year basis, shipments were down 13.8% and that was partially offset. The impact of that was partially offset by 6.7% increase in average selling prices.

Did you have a sequential numbers or? Michael C. Gazmarian: Yeah. We do. Thanks

Okay.

Sir, does that conclude your question?

Yes, it does.

Thank you and I see no further questions on queue at this time. H. O. Woltz III: Okay. Thank you for your interest in the company and we are updating you next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today’s conference. This does conclude the program and you may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.