Bill Waelke - Investor Relations Ivo Jurek - Chief Executive Officer David Naemura - Chief Financial Officer

Jeff Hammonds - Keybanc Deane Dray - RBC Capital Markets Andrew Caslowitz - Citi Jerry Revich - Goldman Sachs Charley Brady - SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Jamie Cook - Credit Suisse Sawyer Rice - Morgan Stanley David Silverman - UBS

’:

Thank you for joining us on our first earnings call as a public company. I am Bill Waelke, Head of Investor Relations and with me today are our CEO Ivo Jurek, and CFO, David Naemura. Shortly after the market closed this afternoon, we published our fourth quarter and full year 2017 results on our Investor Relations website. A copy of the release is available on our website at investors.gates.com. Today’s call is being webcast and is accompanied by a slide presentation, which includes a reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP financial measures that we will use during this call and is also available on our website. Please refer now to Slide 2 of the presentation, which is a reminder that our remarks and answers will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigations Reform Act. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks that could cause actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks include, among others, matters that we have described in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC and other filings we make with the SEC. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, which may not be updated until our next quarterly earnings call if at all. On our call today, Ivo and David will provide a review of our financial performance and segment results as well as our guidance for 2018. I will now turn the call over to Ivo.

Thanks, Bill. Good afternoon. Thank you for joining us today to review our fourth quarter and full year results and provide outlook for 2018. I will begin on Slide 4. We are pleased to report strong results on this first earnings call as a public company. In the fourth quarter and full year 2017, we delivered strong revenue growth. Throughout the year, we were able to capitalize on our organic growth initiatives and the strong demand environment we are experiencing across many of our industrial end-markets, resulting in core revenue growth of over 9% for the fourth quarter and full year. We also continue to expand our longstanding presence in emerging markets where we experienced double-digit core revenue growth in 2017. As a result of the strong revenue performance and continued execution of the Gates operating system, we were able to deliver record Q4 and full year adjusted EBITDA. We also demonstrated the ability to further expand margins with our adjusted EBITDA margin increasing roughly 50 basis points in both the fourth quarter and full year excluding the impact of 2017 acquisitions that I will cover momentarily. This margin expansion was achieved while we continued to invest in the business to position ourselves for further growth. Over the course of the year, we upgraded and supplemented our commercial product line and engineering capabilities, particularly in our fluid power segment. We also expanded our commercial presence in emerging markets and strengthened our position as those replacement channels continued to develop. In late 2016, we made the decision to invest in additional fluid power capacity to accommodate our growth initiatives as well as future customer demands. We are now nearing the completion of two new fluid power manufacturing plants constructed at existing Gates locations, which we expect to come online in the second half of this year and ramp up into 2019. We expect these investments to position us well for growth, particularly at a time where there is not significant excess capacity in the industry. As mentioned during 2017, we also completed two bolt-on acquisitions in our fluid power segment to accelerate our growth initiatives. Techflow Flexibles, acquired in June, is a manufacturer of high-pressure hose and fittings for oil and gas applications that complements our product portfolio and adds to our technical capabilities. Atlas Hydraulics, acquired in October, specializes in the design and manufacture of hydraulics tubing and related assemblies, also expanding our product portfolio and presence in the North American industrial market. For the full year 2017, these acquisitions contributed just over 1% of our total revenue growth. Finally, 2017 saw us make additional progress on our goal of de-leveraging the business. With a combination of strong free cash flow generation and expected growth of adjusted EBITDA, we expect our leverage metrics to continue to improve toward our mid-term goal of getting below 3x net leverage. Turning now to Slide 5 and our performance by segment, beginning with power transmission, our power transmission business focuses on applications where belts, chains, and other devices transfer mechanical power. We believe that most of these applications are inherently better served by belt-based drive systems in part due to their lighter weight, lower maintenance requirements and energy efficient performance to name just a few of the advantages. The power transmission segment delivered core revenue growth of 9.1% and 7.3% for the fourth quarter and full year 2017 respectively. We saw solid growth across all end markets, with particularly strong results in the construction, ag and general industrial markets. Our emerging markets also performed well, a reflection of our focused organic growth initiatives in these higher growth countries. We are currently in the early innings of rolling out our broader chain-to-belt conversion initiative and we continue to pursue a number of conversion opportunities, examples of which include the personal mobility space, industrial MRO and mobile equipment applications. Our focus in this area will be on fewer, larger opportunities where we can penetrate applications in markets of meaningful size. In terms of adjusted EBITDA margins, we delivered 163 basis points of improvement in Q4 and 86 basis points of improvement during full year 2017 on a year-over-year basis. These results were delivered primarily through volume and continued gains in manufacturing productivity. On Slide 6, our fluid power business offers customers fit-for-purpose products for a wide array of industrial applications in premium hydraulics and other fluid transfer solutions. The fluid power segment also achieved 9.1% core revenue growth during Q4, with 12.6% core revenue growth for the full year. The execution of our organic growth initiatives, the healthy industrial end markets demand and the two fluid power acquisitions that we completed during the year all contributed to our growth. In addition to the two new manufacturing facilities that I mentioned, we are building out further capacity at certain other of our existing fluid power sites. We believe that these investments, combined with a strong end-market demand and our growth initiatives to expand our addressable market in hydraulics will put us in a favorable position while our additional capacity comes online. While our fluid power segment delivered strong growth in the fourth quarter and for the full year, our adjusted EBITDA margin does reflect the investments we have made in growth both on an inorganic and organic basis. Our two acquisitions are performing in line with our expectations and are on a clear path to margin improvement, which we expect to result in earnings parity over the next 18 to 24 months. Our organic investments are being made to strengthen our commercial product line, application engineering and product development capabilities to help us deliver on the growth opportunities we see in this segment. Since this is our first earnings call, I would like to clarify what our approximate and end-market exposures are based on 2017 revenues to help add context to the numbers and also to help establish baseline understanding of our business. We have provided a few different breakdowns of our revenue on Slide 7. First, I will reference the pie charts on the far right and point out that over one-third of our revenues are generated from emerging markets, which reflects our well-established presence in these markets and frankly some of the benefits of our in-region/for-region strategy. In the center pie chart, we show a breakdown of our replacement versus first-fit channels and further detail our end market exposures. I will start by noting that our total revenues are positively correlated to global industrial production and not any one individual end market principally due to the fact that 63% of our revenues are through replacement or after-market channels, which are typically less volatile and more recurring in nature. Beginning with the first-fit, about 18% of our total revenues is in the industrial first-fit end-markets, with construction, heavy duty trucks, ag and general industrial markets being the largest end-market exposures. First fit add-on in 2017 was 19% of our total revenues, with the majority of the 19 points being in emerging markets, China being the largest single country. Developed markets out of first-fit sales were about 9% of revenues and I would note that only about 2% of total sales was from add-on first-fit customers in the U.S. Our strategy is to remain very selective around this first-fit business we take. We will be opportunistic in developed markets and we will look to participate where we can introduce differentiated products for a new technology. In emerging markets, there tends to be a less developed aftermarket channel and our first-fit presence helped us to develop our aftermarket presence, which is a key objective of how we decide to participate. The replacement channel reflects the majority of our business and the majority of it is into industrial applications and end markets. Replacement sales into industrial applications are approximately 36% of total revenue, with the largest single end-market being general industrial, a large portion of which serves manufacturing, process and other industrial facilities. Beyond general industrial, our largest end markets are ag, construction, heavy duty truck, and oil and gas. Our replacement business that serves automotive applications is approximately 27% of our total sales and behaves much differently than first-fit demand. Sales to the automotive aftermarket are driven by factors such as miles driven, the age of the fleet in a given geography, the price of fuel and general economic conditions. We tend to see the most demand as the fleet age is into the 7 to 12-year range, which we view as a positive trend currently in North America as well as in emerging markets, particularly China, where the growth in the age portion of the fleet is very favorable. And lastly, we are primarily focused on the do-it-for-me sub-segment of this market. So, in total, about 9% of our total revenues are from developed markets first-fit auto applications and over half of our end-market exposure is related to industrial applications. I hope this is helpful in establishing a baseline. We do not plan on providing this information on consistent basis, but may revisit it at some point in the future. Moving on to geographies, as you can see on Slide 8, we experienced strong core revenue growth across most of our regions. This growth was driven by combination of targeted commercial actions, strong industrial end markets globally and increased sales in certain first-fit applications, primarily in emerging markets. Our strongest core growth came in China, where we had double-digit growth across all our end markets for the full year. The strong growth in China was followed by EMEA, with North America and South America also contributing solidly. In East Asia and India, growth in our replacement markets was offset by continued headwinds in the offshore oil and gas end markets, which have not recovered like the land rig driven oil and gas market in North America. We are seeing generally positive macro environments throughout our regions and believe we are well-positioned, particularly with our in-region/for-region manufacturing strategy and significant commercial presence to take advantage of these favorable market dynamics. With that, I will now turn this over to David to provide additional inputs on our financial results. David?

Thanks, Ivo. I will now cover our Q4 financial performance beginning on Slide 9, where as Ivo mentioned earlier, you can see the record results that we have delivered for revenue and adjusted EBITDA, adding to our core growth of 9.1% in the quarter where an additional 3.2 points of growth from foreign currency and 4.8 points of growth from our acquisitions bringing total Q4 revenue growth to 17.1%. The core growth of 9.1% was in large part driven by growth on our industrial end-markets, particularly ag and construction, which grew about 17%. Energy was strong at about 15% growth driven primarily by oil and gas in North America and heavy-duty truck was up about 15% with growth in all of our major regions. Our adjusted EBITDA of $173 million was an increase of $25 million or 17% over the prior year Q4. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 22.1%, about flat with the prior year due to the temporary diluted impact of acquisitions in the year. Excluding the impact of acquisitions, adjusted EBITDA margin was 22.6%, an increase of about 50 basis points over the prior year Q4. We did see some modest inflation in the quarter, with raw materials increasing about $5 million, which we more than offset with price within the quarter. Our net earnings for the quarter and for the full year were impacted by a few items that we don’t see recurring in the future. Earnings were favorably impacted by a one-time non-cash net tax benefit of about $118 million. This benefit resulted from the implementation of U.S. tax reform, which I will talk more about on a later slide. Also, impacting earnings was a portion of the revaluation of our euro-denominated debt that is not designated as a net investment hedge and therefore flows through P&L. As part of our IPO structuring, we have removed this impact from flowing through P&L in future periods. The impact to pre-tax earnings from this revaluation was $11.7 million negative in Q4 and $61.2 million negative for the full year 2017. On this slide, we have presented a year-over-year comparable adjusted net income number, which adjusts for these non-standard items and also adds back intangible amortization from the LBO in 2014 as well as a few other items with a reconciliation provided in the appendix. Now talking into the full year results on Slide 10, full year core revenue growth was 9% with an additional 0.5 point from FX and 1.2 points from acquisitions, resulting in total growth of 10.7%. Our growth profile for the full year was similar to that in the fourth quarter, with double-digit core growth across most industrial end-markets driven primarily by ag and construction as well as oil and gas in North America in our general industrial category. This serves a number of end markets and applications. For the full year, we grew in all of our major commercial regions and grew in all of our major end-markets as well. We ended 2017 with adjusted EBITDA of $669 million at an adjusted EBITDA margin of 22%, both records for the company. On an apples-to-apples basis with the prior year, excluding the impact of the two acquisitions in the year, our comparable adjusted EBITDA margin was 22.2%, representing margin expansion of just over 50 basis points over 2016. We did see increased inflation during 2017 partially driven by global shortage of a key polymer input earlier in the year as well as modest increases to general inflation in the latter portion of the year. We believe the raw material inflation in the year was about $20 million and that we effectively offset about 75% of this in the year with price and that we will be fully offset by the end of the first quarter of 2018. We agree with most views that we are entering a more inflationary environment and remain committed to react with pricing where appropriate. And given our greater than 60% replacement market focus and the strength of our brand, we believe that we are well-positioned in this regard. Our adjusted net income for the year increased by about $25 million over 2016 with the benefits of the higher adjusted EBITDA flowing through partially offset by a higher normalized tax rate in 2017 as well as higher interest expense due to the accelerated amortization of the deferred financing fees resulting from the debt refinancing in April. Slide 11 provides detail on key cash flow items and our focus on continued de-leveraging in the business, excluding the incremental trade working capital that we acquired with Atlas Hydraulics, our trade working capital improved 100 basis points in 2017 as a percent of sales. We have presented free cash flow as net cash flow provided by operations less CapEx and reflected that as a conversion of adjusted net income. This free cash flow measure is unfavorable versus the prior year on dollar and conversion basis. Although we improved EBITDA performance in 2017 over the prior year, we had higher CapEx associated with our growth investments and our sales growth had the impact of increasing working capital dollars, even though it was at a lower rate than in prior years. Finally, we also benefited from a $41 million tax refund in 2016 that we did not have this year. For 2017, our CapEx was about 3.7% of sales, up from the historical rate of 2.5% to 3%. This higher CapEx is associated with additional growth investments primarily the build-out of additional fluid power capacity to support our organic growth initiatives. Given the growth opportunities that we see, we anticipate maintaining or possibly even slightly increasing this level of spend on a percentage basis over the next couple of years. Finally, on leverage, we ended 2017 with a net leverage ratio of just over 5x. If we were to look at 2017 year end on a pro forma basis and adjusted for the IPO proceeds that were all used for debt reduction purposes, our net leverage at that point will be just under 4x. Turning to U.S. tax reform, we received a one-time non-cash net tax benefit of approximately $118 million primarily driven by revaluation of our deferred tax liabilities at the new lower U.S. rate partially offset by a few negative items, primarily transition tax. Excluding this favorable tax benefit, our effective tax rate was a bit artificially high due to pre-tax income, including a loss on the revaluation of our euro-denominated debt which I mentioned before and which is not deductible for tax purposes. Normalizing for these items, we see our underlying run-rate effective tax rate for 2017 around 27%. We are still determining all of the go-forward impacts of tax reform, but currently estimate the impact to our effective tax rate would be plus or minus about 150 basis points in 2018 from the normalized 2017 baseline of 27%. Moving to our outlook on Slide 13, we believe that 2018 will be another year of strong performance as we see good momentum in our end-markets and as we continue to execute on our large growth initiatives. We are introducing guidance for 2018 total revenue growth in the range of 7.5% to 10.5%. Underlying this revenue growth is core growth that we believe will be in the range of 5% to 6%. We are not providing segment level guidance, but believe that our growth in fluid power will again outpace that power transmission. We plan to continue to invest in our commercial and product line organizations and expect that adjusted EBITDA for 2018 will be between $735 million and $755 million or around 22.5% adjusted EBITDA margin about 50 basis points of expansion over 2017. With that, I will now hand it back to Ivo.

Thanks, Dave. I am extremely pleased with the performance we delivered in 2017, which is a result of solid execution for our entire global team. We grew organically in our core markets and supplemented our growth with acquisitions. We were also able to improve our adjusted EBITDA margin and reduce our leverage while continuing to invest in the business to position the company for further growth. We continue to build on the progress that we have made improving our operations and not just from factory productivity standpoint, but in safety and quality as well. We are excited to have gained strength in this next phase as a public company and we believe we are well positioned to achieve our growth objectives while remaining focused on creating value for our shareholders. With that, I will turn the call over to the operator to open up Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Jeff Hammonds with Keybanc.

Hey, good afternoon. So, you touched on price cost, can you just walk us through what you announced more recently into this year on pricing – what you captured in price last year? And then if you can just walk us through some of the major raw material inputs that you would be impacted by?

Yes, sure. So, generally speaking last year, there was a bit of a shock to the system with rapid inflation of butadiene that happened in really the first quarter of the year. I think the whole industry reacted – it was more of a disruption in the supply chain. And I would say that was over half of the inflation we saw during the year. We reacted to that with price, as did most people that used those polymers synthetic rubber from things we make to tires, but there was a delay in doing that So, I think we were kind of chasing that factor all year. As the year progressed and we saw the ramp up in the industrial end-markets, a lot of particular demand on the fluid power side, we did respond with further price in the second half of the year. The additional inflation that we saw in the second half was principally around steel and metals, both of these items obviously impacting our fluid power business. I think we carried pretty good price into the year, fair to even what we are seeing on the raw materials side. It will always be plus or minus, but we have always thought we are well positioned to price given the nature of our business and I think we have so far accomplished that. As far as raw material inputs, our two biggest inputs are metals and polymers most significantly. Raw materials, I would tell you, is about 60% of our cost of sales and those are the two biggest categories.

Okay, great. And then just on fluid power, I mean, you explained some of the margin contracture around the acquisitions, but it looks even ex that you came in a little bit. But I don’t know if that’s just tough comp from 4Q which looked elevated or any noise or any headwinds you are seeing in that business around just the rapid rate of growth that would have impacted that?

Yes. So two things, I think you are touching on it, Jeff. So first, we invested in the business. So, we actually got more efficient in R&D on the power transmission side and then we kind of reallocated that spend over to the fluid power side on some of the growth initiatives that we have as well as some new products that we are pretty excited about. Also as we saw rapid kind of industry snapback rapidly that was a little disruptive to us and there was some inefficiencies associated with that. Example would be we had to outsource some slab stock that we would usually typically manufacture ourselves and there were a few other factors like that expediting freight things like that. We have a lot of important OE customers and we look to take care of those guys and do whatever it takes. So, those were the two things that were really a bit disruptive in the fourth quarter.

Okay. Thanks, guys.

Thank you.

Your next question is from Deane Dray with RBC Capital Markets.

Good afternoon, everyone. Hey, I’d like to start with China. We are all used to seeing some pretty strong growth numbers coming out of China, but not 27%. So that begs questions about where – you said all end-markets were up double-digits, is that where were they this strongest and then was there a comp issue and what’s your level of confidence and what’s the sustainable growth rate looking ahead?

Hi, Deane. Thanks. Yes, we had a terrific year in China as we have discussed in past conversations. We have been positioning ourselves for growth, making nice investments in China. And frankly, we have seen very strong performance across all end markets strong in auto, continuing to see significant growth in that market, very strong in infrastructure and general industrial on both sides of our market segment. So, although we are a bit timid about forecasting 2018 – again, we don’t necessarily forecast by region nor do we give guidance by quarter, we have accounted for slightly lower growth in 2018, but remain very positive about what we see in China and the effort that our teams are putting forward to execute.

Okay, that’s good to hear. And then as a follow-up question, I would like to hear more around the capacity that you are adding in fluids. You have got the two plants that are coming online. You said you are also adding other capacity in existing plants. At what point did your hit the – at what level of capacity utilization, do you pull the trigger and say, we need to add, where was that level? And then when you look at this capacity coming online, how much is already spoken for in terms of your visibility on demand? How quickly will these facilities ramp up?

Yes, many questions in one. I will tell you that we had the foresight to come in and start planning the capacity expansion project of the two new green sites in Q3, Q4 of 2016, which frankly wasn’t a great time to talk about capacity expansion as we were kind of in the midst of the industrial downturn. And so we felt that our organic growth initiatives, our investments in product line expansions will necessitate further capacity as we were kind of thinking about it in the middle of 2018. Well, we exited the industrial downturn a little bit faster in the middle of last year. We have made some quick decisions to add incremental capacity in our existing footprint. We have done that. That capacity is going to start coming onstream during the Q2 of this year with the two new sites coming onstream in a measured way from latter part of Q3 into Q4. And I would stay away from how much of the capacity this is disposed, Deane, it’s very robust market that we see presently and I expect that capacity is going to be well received.

Great. Thank you and congratulations on your first quarterly earnings.

Thanks, Deane.

Thanks, Deane.

Your next question is from Andrew Caslowitz with Citi.

Hey, good afternoon, guys. Congrats on the quarter.

Thanks, Andy.

Ivo or Dave, can you give us a little color regarding the breakdown of core growth in 4Q ‘17? What I mean is the 9.1% core growth entire transmission was higher than we had modeled – 9.1% in fluid power was maybe a little lower, was the higher growth in power transmission at all because of I know the chain-to-belt is in the very early going, was there anything there or was it really just acceleration and construction ag and industrial as you mentioned? And then could you give us any color on how the auto replacement business performed in that business?

Yes. Briefly, I would say in the fourth quarter we were a little bit surprised by how robust China was on the automotive first-fit side. As you know, we really like automotive first-fit in emerging markets, particularly China, but the year-over-year compare was crazy. Last year, China was very robust – growth in the 40s, I think in Q4 given the government incentives that were in place on lower sized engines and lower emission engines – and we didn’t think that we would have as much growth off that as we did, but we did grow off that and that was actually personally modeling a little bit of a decline. So, we were robust on the industrial side, I think we came in a little higher driven by emerging market first-fit.

Did auto replacement, is that sort of a low single-digit grower or how is that business?

I think we saw kind of stabilized growth in automotive replacement in developed markets, in particular, continuing to click along well in emerging markets, but I think we saw steady-eddy in automotive replacement as we typically do.

Okay, that’s helpful. And then – go ahead, do you want to say something, Ivo?

Yes, Andy, I would just say that we have probably seen maybe improving conditions as we were exiting Q4, particularly in North America AR. So, that was probably a more positive sign of what was happening in that market.

Got it. And Ivo, do you think that that business can grow in 2018? Is that your current expectations?

Yes, my expectation, Andy, is that we are going to see improved performance in AR, particularly in North America. Again, we have grown that business very nicely outside of North America, but we now are entering a phase where the 2008-2009 recession and the drop of car registrations is going to start filtering through in the age car part – that 7 to 12 year old car part. So that should provide some tailwind for that business in North America in particular and frankly the growth in the emerging economies and obviously you see the registration growing in China. So, we should start seeing more positive market dynamics there as well. And as we have explained, we have been investing quite significantly there to capitalize on that well.

’:

Yes. I would say, look, it is – the investments and the kind of shock to the system and how quickly we had to bring up capacity or why we were down year-over-year in the quarter, if not for – look, maybe the full year is better, we were down 9 bps excluding the impact of the acquisitions. I would say the R&D investment impact to the full year was about 60 bps if that gives you an idea of where the year would have come in without the investment. So the kind of supply shock was a little bit more of a Q4 issue. So, yes, we would have been – I think we would have been okay around where we had been running. Look the investment we are putting in is for new products – is for some really exciting BA/BE stuff that we will be bringing out, talking about more in the spring I think and we are really excited about that. So we are putting kind of the wood behind the arrow on that. And as far as could we have sold more? Yes, we probably could and that’s why we are ramping up capacity and we feel good about the capacity coming online in the fourth quarter. And frankly, we continued also, as we speak to fill out open floor space in existing plants that we are not bringing down to the ground. So we are continuing to bring up capacity as quickly as we can.

Got it. Thanks, guys.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question is from Jerry Revich with Goldman Sachs.

Yes, hi, good afternoon, everyone.

Hi, Jerry.

Jerry, hi.

I am wondering if you folks can talk about as you look across the global manufacturing footprint, where is capacity utilization the tightest and in those areas, how much scope do you have to increase production as you continue the Gates operating system bottlenecking process versus bringing on additional headcount? Can you just give us some context on the drivers of production growth in those areas that I am sure are baked into the operating plan?

Yes, Jerry, this is Ivo. I would say that the tightest capacity constraint that we see frankly is in Asia. Again you have seen very solid growth numbers there. We all saw bringing capacity fastest there. So we feel reasonably well positioned being able to support the demand. And in a developed market, I speak now starting with fluid power – in the developed markets, the situation is pretty robust across all of the geographies as we outlined in our prepared remarks. And we are running as fast as we can to get the Greenfields up and running and we expect as I indicated to start getting capacity to marketplace sometimes in Q3. So very tight out there right now from where we sit. On the power transmission, we are in a good place. Again, I will tell you, that probably the tightest capacity but not to the degree that we have seen fluid powers in China with power transmission. And in the other geographies, we are in a pretty good place. We continued to drive our Gates Operating System, create more capacity, drive productivity, so we feel pretty good about that.

Okay. And then from a Gates Operating System standpoint, the focus on the past couple of years has been on operating efficiency improvement, what about philosophically, price costs going forward, a lot of characteristics that you described about the business would suggest pricing at a material costs over time and obviously we didn’t see that in ‘17, are you optimistic that we will see pricing ahead of inflation in ‘18 and how do you think about your ability to push pricing ahead of inflation through the cycle now that the Gates Operating System is, call it 3 years in place?

Yes. Jerry, I will take that one, it’s Dave. I would say that first of all, as it relates to Gates Operating System, we will continue to get benefits, albeit at a lower rate than we have in the last 3 years as we have done a lot of things that were before a splinter constant improvement mode. And I think we will see that transition more to BA-BE activities where we will try to get cost out of the product and introduce products that are more efficient from a manufacturing perspective. So I think that is where Gates Operating System transitions to as well as trying to influencing the front end of the new product development design side. On the price-cost side, that has kind of always been in place and always been our philosophy. I think we are getting better at it. We did lag a little bit in 2017, but again I think I said in my remarks, I think we have priced for 75% of the inflation that we saw which came rapidly and I think we will be price-cost neutral at the end of this quarter for the inflation we have seen. We are pricing ahead, will it be enough, I mean we think we are well positioned, but there is a lot of uncertainty out there. There is a lot of uncertainty around inflation and other things and so we are – I think we are being appropriate in the marketplace and we will continue to do that. I can assure you it is front and center for us.

And maybe if I can add on and Jerry that the way that we want to run this company is to ensure that pricing offsets material economics and that’s probably the best way to think about it as we enter the more inflationary environment.

And Dave just a clarification, in the first quarter you are getting enough pricing to not only offset inflation that you are seeing in the first quarter, but to make up for that 25% shortfall from ‘17, is that correct?

That’s what we anticipate. I mean we – it’s measured at the end of the quarter. Obviously, we are in the biggest month here. But the idea was that that lag should catch up and so yes, we will catch up what we will see this quarter plus what we were lagging coming out of the year.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks Jerry.

Your next question is from Charley Brady with SunTrust Robinson Humphrey.

Thanks. Good evening guys, I was just wondering on the capacity additions that are coming online and particularly the Greenfield plants you have got coming on in 2H, how come the margin impact factors into your guidance for the full-year, I would think there is obviously some of that is inefficiencies when you are spooling up a plant like that, do you get the offset for the first half of the year on the additional capacity, because obviously that’s existing footprint and it’s probably going to spool up pretty quick, it’s probably margin accretive, but I am just curious on the big plants that are going in, how does that impact the margin. And then obviously, it’s going to flow into 2019, do you make up for that on a year run rate?

Yes. So the impacts, there are some inefficiencies as we stand up these large plants. Thankfully, they are at existing sites. So we don’t have a lot of idle indirect and those kinds of things, but we think the impact to gross margin, ultimately EBITDA margin of the inefficiencies is about 25 basis points and that’s baked into the guidance that we have put forward for 2018. And you are right, as we get into 2019, we will get some benefits and we will have the opportunity then to continue to build out capacity throughout 2019 on these large footprints.

Great, that’s helpful. And then just on the chain to belt conversion that you spoke a little bit about in the prepared remarks, I wondered if you can just expand upon that opportunity, obviously it’s going to be an expansion over time and a ramp-up like you said, but maybe what’s kind of ultimately helpful, I think that for folks to get an understanding of the ultimate size of that opportunity, maybe granularity on really more specifics on the types of applications you are pursuing there?

Yes. Sure. Look, we are in very early in it of realizing this opportunity, but we have begun to see the attraction in the market as well as we are identifying a significant number of future opportunities. On the chain to belt, it’s a significant opportunity. We are currently focusing on a few handful of applications to convert say in grain elevators, infrastructure, aggregate material process, wide industrial distribution opportunities and so on and so forth. So we have had number of ongoing initiatives in personal mobility, including bikes which are well documented, bike share in China, which was something we have entered in 2017, probably think we probably saw somewhere in the $10 million to $20 million in these conversions over the last 18 months and we expect that continues to ramp up. Look, the way that we look at this market, it’s of a $17 billion market space where again, we are just entering the early stages of being able to convert applications. And we think over next 5 years to 10 years, we should be able to progressively generate a nice set of runways to drive the organic growth in the range that we have communicated with the investors during the IPO road show.

Thank you.

Your next question is from Jamie Cook with Credit Suisse.

Hi, good evening, most of my questions have been answered, I guess just two follow-ups, one can you just comment on the sort of order trends or what you have seen so far in the first quarter, I would assume the demand trends continue to be strong and I don’t know if they are trending above sort of your targeted 5% to 6% organic growth, although it’s early in the year I get that, but any color there. And then my second question, any more color you can provide on free cash flow in 2018, just any anomalies, do we have to build a little inventory just given some of the manufacturing investments and just given that demand is so strong? Thanks.

Yes sure. So let me start with the order trends. Look, we are not forecasting our orders, but taking into an account that we are late in Q1, I would say that we see similar order patterns that we have seen in Q4, which was a pretty strong quarter. Please remember that there is some seasonality that we see with our business. Generally speaking, Q4 is the weakest quarter, Q1 and Q3 are kind of the second strongest, Q2 is the strongest quarter for us. So we don’t have anything that we would say presently that is different than what we have seen with order trends and market environment exiting Q4 into Q1. Dave, why don’t you take the free cash flow?

Yes. On the free cash flow side, I guess because the real consideration here is less, I think inventory build as we bring up these new facilities and more around CapEx. We converted slightly at a lower rate this year on our adjusted net income metric and we would continue to target the general guidance I would give you as we would continue to target 100% conversion or better except for the higher amount of growth capital that we invest. And I would say that we would invest at about that same rate than we invested in the prior year as a percent of sales, if not a little bit higher. So I think that’s probably the one anomaly I would give you some color on.

Okay. Thank you. I will get back in queue, nice quarter.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from Sawyer Rice with Morgan Stanley.

Hi Sawyer.

Hi, good evening. Congrats on the first quarter out of the blocks here.

Thank you.

Most of mine have been asked and answered, but maybe just one on the M&A front, just thinking about the appetite for Gates for M&A, particularly prior to reaching that 3x net leverage mark and then any areas of focus you guys have in the M&A pipeline? Thanks.

Okay, you bet. Look, M&A has got to be a balance for us. I think we have been pretty consistent about saying we are not looking to go do a transformational deal and never say never, but ultimately, we are focused on de-leveraging the business, but ultimately our priority is growth. And we will use M&A to accelerate our really good large organic growth priorities where appropriate, being mindful of leverage. So bolt-ons tend to have higher returns and we think there is a lot of opportunities out there for that given the highly fragmented nature of the markets that we play in. So, we have a continued pipeline. We are looking emerging market deals. We are looking at industrial opportunities associated with our growth initiatives and kind of in the range of what you saw in 2017 is kind of how we are still thinking about it. So we will see as that develops, but thanks for asking that. I think we will take one last question.

Our last question comes from Steven Winoker with UBS.

Hey, thanks. This is David Silverman on for Steven Winoker. Can you talk about how you are thinking about electric vehicle proliferation? Theoretically, you have a comparable amount of dollar content in EVs relative to ICE and even more content ICE, I think in hybrids, but it’s immaterial to your business today likely to become more important over time. So, just wondering how and if you are positioning your business to prepare for electric vehicle growth?

’:

Thanks. That’s helpful.

Thank you.

And I will now turn the call back over to the presenters.

Thanks everyone for joining us here on this inaugural call. We are excited to have had the opportunity to update you on our progress. We look forward to delivering on our growth objectives and continuing to update you on our progress in the future.

This concludes today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.