Jeff Heinz - Director, Investor Relations Gracia C. Martore - Principal Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer Craig A. Dubow - Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer Robert J. Dickey - President, U.S. Community Publishing Christopher D. Saridakis - Senior Vice President and Chief Digital Officer

John Janedis - Wells Fargo Alexia Quadrani - J.P. Morgan Peter Jacobs - Ragen Mackenzie Research Michael Kupinski - Noble Financial Group John Corright - Sandler Capital Craig Huber - Private Investor Jim Goss - Barrington Research

Good day, everyone and welcome to Gannett's third quarter 2009 earnings conference call. (Operator Instructions) Our speakers for today will be Craig Dubow, Chairman, President, and CEO; and Gracia Martore, Executive Vice President and CFO. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Miss Gracia Martore. Please go ahead, Madam. Gracia C. Martore: Thanks, Laura and good morning. Welcome to our conference call and webcast to review Gannett's third quarter 2009 results. Hopefully you have had the opportunity to review our press release this morning and it also can be found at www.gannett.com. Before we get started, however, I need to remind you as always that our conference call and webcast today may include forward-looking statements and our actual results may differ. Factors that might cause them to differ are outlined in our SEC filings. This presentation also includes certain non-GAAP financial measures. We have provided a reconciliation of those measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures in the press release and on the investor relations portion of our website. Craig will provide an update on our strategic efforts and summarize our quarterly results briefly. I will follow with a more detailed look at the numbers, as well as some balance sheet items. Now let me turn the call over to Craig, and welcome back. Craig A. Dubow: Thanks, Gracia. Before we begin the discussion of our third quarter results, I would like to mention a few things. First, I am very glad to be back and I am looking forward to discussing the Gannett Company with you today. The surgeries, the recovery, and rehab all went well and I am happy to say I am on a road to a full recovery. I received messages from many of you and I want to thank you for your kind thoughts. Secondly, I’d like to thank Gracia and the management team and all of our employees for their outstanding work during my leave. We continued to move forward on several strategic initiatives and that is testament to the strength of our management team here at Gannett. An important step was achieved in very late September with the launch and successful completion of our $500 million bond financing. The transaction was extremely well-received in the capital markets and gives us some flexibility as we manage our capital structure. At the same time, we announced estimate ranges for several key results for the third quarter. I am very pleased to report that we exceeded even our expectations due to a better-than-anticipated finish to the quarter. This was driven primarily by better trends in advertising and our continued success in lowering cost and achieving greater efficiencies across all of our business segments. Before we get into the quarter, I wanted to update you on the progress of some of those initiatives. Despite the continued weak economy, which we believe is still pretty fragile, a great deal has been accomplished in several key areas. We continue to execute on our long-term strategy. We are positioning the company for when the economy rebounds and at the same time, meet the continued consumer demand for content in any form and on any platform they desire. To meet changing market dynamics and consumer expectations, we continue to transform our traditional businesses from content collection to content production and distribution on multiple platforms. At the same time, we are building a growing profitable digital business. A key benefit of the delivery of relevant content on multiple platforms is the ability to engage with a wider audience. Building and aggregating our audiences has never been more important to advertisers. At the same time, access to the content across many platforms is increasingly important to the consumer. Our focus on expanding our reach and bringing customized content to consumers and marketing solutions to advertisers has put us in a better position to weather the current economic environment. It has also enabled us to succeed in the ever-changing media landscape. Our efforts have not gone unnoticed. Scarborough recently completed an analysis of integrated newspaper audience ratings. Gannett papers hold the top three positions in five of the top 10 of the 170 newspapers included in the report. The top-ranking was the Rochester DMA, where 8 of 10 adults in the market read the printed version of our newspaper, The Democrat and Chronicle, visit our website, or do both in a typical week. That local engagement combined with a national overlay of multiple markets is now being sought out by advertisers that need to reach a broad audience and provide locally relevant content to extend their distribution. We announced two partnerships that helped us provide targeted information to very specific audiences. One was with City Feet, the leading online commercial real estate network. It will bring its database of over 350,000 commercial property listings to the online editions of our 83 domestic community newspapers. The second was [Bizbuysell.com], which also partnered with our community newspapers to put its database of nearly 50,000 business for sale listings and over 400 franchise opportunities in our online editions. By adding these two databases to our online network, we will be delivering targeted local information that specific audiences seek. Gannett's wide array of properties and platforms, our ability to integrate them to meet advertisers’ needs, combined with the added benefit of our expertise in creating customer-centric content offers compelling marketing solutions to advertisers that few, if any, companies can provide. The key to Gannett's success is a broad yet diverse reach with many local touch points. A great example of this is the campaign that was put together by a team here for the National Breast Cancer Foundation’s effort to promote its early detection program. We are very proud of this as we are able to help deliver the message for an extremely important cause to the broadest audience possible through Gannett's vast assortment of properties. The campaign represents the type of cross-platform, cross-divisional solution that Gannett is uniquely able to deliver to the marketplace. The network wide campaign included our local newspapers, broadcast stations, and websites, as well as national brands like USA Today, USA Weekend, Captivate, and Momslikeme.com. To fully understand the scope of Gannett's ability to deliver an audience across multiple platforms, let me quickly highlight some of the facets of this campaign. They include an early morning newscast with a single sponsor of the National Breast Cancer Foundation takeover of 20 of our TV stations -- sixty 30-second video vignettes produced by Gannett Video Enterprises that aired in various Gannett newscasts. The National Breast Cancer Foundation’s on-air promotional spots also produced by Gannett Video Enterprises. Home delivery pink plastic bag wrap with the National Breast Cancer Foundation’s message, advertising in our community papers, four-color ads in USA Today and USA Weekend, National Breast Cancer Foundation’s advertising in pink-shaded elevator screens in hotels and office buildings through the Captivate elevator network. Momslikeme.com home page header sponsorship, and the national online discussions group at Momslikeme. As well, mobile pages on USAtoday.com to register for an early detection plan. We are getting a lot of positive responses from advertisers due to this multi-platform, cross-divisional approach. We see a lot of opportunity with this kind of approach and we will keep you posted as we move forward. None of this is possible, however, without having relevant content that engages audiences both locally and nationally. Our Content One initiative is hitting its stride and earlier this year, or earlier this quarter, excuse me, we held a content summit here in Mclean to make content sharing and integration across all Gannett a reality. The benefits are significant. As you can see with the National Breast Cancer Foundation campaign, we are beginning the process of developing content specific to advertisers. During the quarter, USA Today took another step in expanding its brand and our digital platform. In August, we announced the launch of USA Today’s E-edition, which is an exact replica of the newspaper featuring additional interactive and exclusive content. The E-edition product also includes a Saturday/Sunday edition called USA Today Extra. This is USA Today’s first regular weekend product and it is available only to print edition and e-edition subscribers. And earlier this month they followed the success of the USA Today iPhone app with USA Today Autopilot iPhone application sponsored by Hampton Hotels. USA Today is leveraging its exceptional national brand recognition and popularity among travelers with the familiar look and feel of our USA Today newspaper. The app provides them with a host of unique features and tools to help them manage their travel experience with up-to-the-minute flight schedules and delays, weather conditions provided by regional radar based on your location via GPS and much, much more. Throughout all of this, we have been focused on creating efficiencies in all parts of our business. Across the company, we are making changes to operations and cost structure. These are not temporary moves. They are permanent and reflect the continuing efforts to find better ways to operate. We also had to make some very, very difficult decisions that included workforce restructurings. While the economic downturn in the U.S. and U.K. continued to soften advertiser demand, through these efforts and the incredible dedication and work of our employees, we were able to progress on some very important priorities. First, as we have noted on many occasions, we are focused on using free cash flow we generate to pay down our debt. In spite of the weak economy, we generated over $255 million in operating cash flow, which we used to reduce debt by almost $200 million in the quarter. We have reduced our debt by over $500 million year-to-date. As I have said many times before, we are always assessing and managing our capital structure and try to take advantage of opportunities in the capital markets. I am extremely proud of our recent successful bond offerings which exemplifies this. We borrowed $500 million in the capital markets in two $250 million tranches priced with coupons at 8.75 and 9.375 maturing in 2014 and 2017 respectively. As I noted earlier, the transaction was very well-received in the markets and that says a lot about the confidence investors have in the future of the Gannett Company. As I noted, we pre-announced estimate ranges for several key results for the third quarter, so let me briefly cover key results from today’s quarterly announcement and then turn the call over to Gracia. Earnings per diluted share on a GAAP basis were $0.31. As anticipated, we reported charges that totaled about $47 million pretax, which translated to just over $30 million after tax, or $0.13 per share. The special charges related principally to various non-cash asset impairments and facility consolidation costs and workforce restructuring. Excluding the special items, earnings per diluted share on a non-GAAP basis were $0.44 per share. The comparable figure for the third quarter of 2008 was $0.76 per share. Our operating revenues totaled $1.3 billion, which was down about 18%, while the state of the economy has not enabled us to return to top line growth, we are seeing some favorable trends. We recognize that last year’s revenue declines reflected the beginning of the accelerating economic slide in tough capital markets. Taking that into account, we still see revenue trends moving in the right direction in our publishing segment. Once again our year over year comparisons for publishing ad revenue this quarter were better than the year-over-year comparisons for the first and second quarters. In broadcasting, the success we achieved last year with political and Olympic spending made for tough comparisons this year. As anticipated, retransmission fees were substantially higher in the quarter and we are on pace to generate over $56 million for the year. Excluding the impact of Olympic and political spending, core revenues in broadcasting were the best year-over-year comparisons of the year. Digital segment revenue was down about 20% on a pro forma basis but operating cash flow was about 45% higher as we had a sharper expense decline than revenue decline. Year-to-date, our digital revenue company wide were almost $680 million and our digital metrics for the most part were better this September relative to last September. Our expenses were down about 14% and reflect all of the initiatives that we have underway to create efficiencies and fundamentally change our business process, as well as substantially lower newsprint costs. Excluding the special items, company-wide operating expenses were down about 16%. The digital segment includes the consolidation of CareerBuilder for the full quarter. On a pro forma basis, then assuming we consolidated CareerBuilder for both quarters and excluding special items, our operating expenses were actually about 20% lower. That leads to operating cash flow of over $250 million and gives us the ability to pay down debt and continue to invest in the business. Gracia will go into our results in some detail but before I hand the call over to her, I think it’s important to reiterate that the Gannett company is now leaner and more customer-focused than it ever has been. We are solidly profitable and that profitability, even in this tough economy, translates to substantial free cash flow. Our digital business is growing and profitable and most important an integral part of all of our operations. We have made and will continue to make the necessary changes necessary to better align expense with revenue opportunities as they evolve. Above all, we achieved our objectives by continuing to produce the content our audiences seek out and delivering it to them wherever and however they want to find it. As our earnings announcement today demonstrates, we are achieving some measure of success. We have created a significant level of operating leverage that will drive even better results when the economy returns. Before I turn the call over to Gracia, I just want to extend a heartfelt thanks for all of the effort and hard work that she in particular put in to drive the company over the last number of months. I appreciate it and now let me turn the call over to Gracia. Gracia C. Martore: Thanks, Craig. I’ll provide a little more detail on our operating segments and cover some non-operating and balance sheet items. Moving to the segments, in publishing our total revenues on a pro forma basis were about 22% lower and ad revenues were down about 28%. As Craig noted, we are seeing some favorable trends here. Ad declines continue to slow and those declines were a few percentage points better than the second quarter, which was an improvement also over the first quarter. And September was our best comparison month thus far this year. Domestic ad revenues for the quarter were down 26% while at Newsquest, they were down almost 29% in pounds. Once again, comparisons this quarter were the best thus far this year. At Newsquest, the difference was significant. The third quarter comparisons for ad revenue in pounds were 8 percentage points better than the second quarter and 10 percentage points better than the first. The results for each of our major categories were in the press release this morning as follows -- retail was about 22% lower while national was 25% and classified revenue was about 37% lower. But the trend was moving in the right direction and again, September was the best year-over-year comparison month of the year. Retail advertising, although down, finished the quarter slightly better than the second quarter. In the U.S., across all products, the department stores and furniture categories remain challenged, although the third quarter comparisons for both categories were better than the two prior quarters. Retail advertising results in pounds in the U.K. followed much of the same pattern. National advertising, however, was a bit tougher in the third quarter. Advertising revenue at USA Today was about 37% lower. Ad demand there continues to be hampered by the lingering dramatic slowdown in the travel and lodging industries. That slowdown affected USA Today's circulation figures as well. We firmly believe that as travel and lodging rebounds with the eventual up-turn in the economy, USA Today is very well-positioned to be the excellent national advertising platform in print, online, and mobile. And as Craig noted, USA Today continues the online expansion of its national brand through the e-edition and the USA Today travel app for the iPhone, both of which are off to a good start. Classified advertising trends, on the other hand, improved throughout the quarter, and third quarter year-over-year comparisons were about eight percentage points better than the second quarter comparisons. The improvement in the year-over-year comps was over six percentage points on a constant currency basis. Trends in employment and real estate firmed over the quarter and are noted in our press release today. The exchange rate, however, was a headwind for revenues this quarter as it has been all year, so on a constant currency basis, the declines in classified would have been almost 3 percentage points better. While economic signals are somewhat mixed, the economy in the U.K. seems to be stabilizing, or at the very least the downturn seems to be ebbing and results at Newsquest reflect that. The rate of increase in unemployment is slowing and the U.K. economy shrank just six-tenths of a percent in the second quarter, less than previously estimate. GDP stock falling in the three months through September. Revenue declines in Newsquest in the major ad categories again were included in the press release this morning, as were the category details. Across all of the classified categories, the trends were moving in the right direction. Year-over-year comparisons for classified advertising at Newsquest again overall were about 10 percentage points better than the second quarter. The relative improvement was driven primarily by results in the real estate category, which was 22 percentage points better. Before we move to expenses in publishing, there is one item regarding Newsquest and the other revenue category in the publishing segment I want to cover. As you may recall, we had a non-cash write-down in the second quarter related to some printing assets in the U.K. that were being held for sale. We completed that sale at the beginning of the quarter and our exit from that business resulted in the absence of about $21 million in revenues this quarter compared to the third quarter last year. The reduction in revenue impacts the all other revenue line on the income statement and of course, total revenues. Now turning to the expense side, we continue to make very good progress in efforts to reduce costs and gain greater efficiencies. Reported publishing segment expenses were down about 20% in the quarter but more importantly, they were about 22% lower excluding special items in both year. Successful efforts to restructure our workforce, as well as facility consolidations in this and prior quarters, helped drive that expense level down. Our focus on aligning our expense structure with revenue remains a priority. It is an important step in our ongoing efforts to position the company for the future and to capture significant operating leverage when the economy does return. One area of focus has been production and distribution costs. We are continuing to look at opportunities to print for others or to move our printing outside. The consolidation of ad production centers is one of the latest efforts underway, which we began rolling out toward the end of the quarter. Now let me turn to newsprint expense for a moment. As you saw, newsprint expense was also a significant factor in our expense reduction. A substantial drop in newsprint usage prices, combined with a 30% plus decline in consumption, resulted in newsprint expense that was about 43% lower in the quarter. As you know, domestic and offshore newsprint markets continue to favor publishers. Since late 2008, North American prices have fallen an excessive $300 per metric ton. The primary driver for this downturn is a sizable imbalance in supply versus demand. At our Newsquest operations in the U.K., where newsprint prices are negotiated and fixed annually normally, we originally assumed 2009 prices would rise by a moderate double-digit percentage for the full year. But the same conditions of over-supply plaguing North American producers are also apparent throughout Europe. While prices were up in the mid- to high-teens in the first half of the year, as of mid-year Newsquest prices will decline by a low-teens percentage in the second half of the year compared to the first half of ’09. Industry observers in North America agree that over 2 million tons of capacity would have to be permanently removed to achieve market balance. Producers have idled but not closed production capacity as the variance between capacity and shipments continues to grow. These market fundamentals didn’t support an attempted August increase but producers are again trying to raise prices, albeit inconsistently. Eastern and Western regions are divided on timing and some producers are seeking to raise prices by a lesser amount than others. Despite these increase announcements, prices are likely to remain under pressure and to bounce around a bit until supply is in line with demand. We will continue to see favorable price comparisons in the fourth quarter and certainly into next year. Now moving to broadcasting, we are seeing some promising trends here as well. A substantial increase in retransmission revenue to over $14 million and a solid quarter by Captivate partially offset the near absence of about $50 million of Olympic and political spending and [Softia] ad demand, particularly auto advertising. If you exclude Olympic and election spending, our core television revenue would have been down in the high-single-digits, making the third quarter the best quarter of the year on a comparable basis. In September, in fact, several categories, such as packaged goods, medical, dental, and media had substantial double-digit gains. Looking to the fourth quarter, the historic success we achieved in garnering an out-sized share of political advertising in our markets, over $58 million in the fourth quarter last year, creates a fairly tough comparison this year. We expect to see a similar level of retransmission fees in the fourth as this quarter, so we expect to exceed $56 million for the year. Based on current trends, we expect the percentage decline in total television revenue in the fourth quarter to be in the low 20s percentage range. But excluding the impact of political, we expect net revenues to actually be up in the low-single-digit range. Turning to the expense side, total expenses in broadcasting reflects strategic consolidations, some compensation actions, and more efficient operations. As you saw, reported expenses were down 4.1%, while expenses excluding special items were almost 9% lower. Turning to our digital segment, revenues totaled $143 million in the quarter, up about 84%, primarily due to the consolidation of CareerBuilder. Revenues declined about 20% on a pro forma basis, reflecting the impact the weak economy has had on employment advertising as well as our digital marketing services companies. Expense savings outpaced the revenue declines and were about 28% on a pro forma basis. And although CareerBuilder’s tight rein on expenses drove much of the cost saves, almost all of the digital segment properties had expense savings that exceeded their revenue declines. Therefore, operating income was about $10 million or 71% higher than last year, and operating cash flow increased about 45% over last year. The operating cash flow margin in the digital segment on a pro forma basis was over 23% compared to almost 13% a year ago. Digging a little deeper into CareerBuilder, North American network revenue declined about 28% compared to the third quarter last year. As a reminder, that revenue figure reflects CareerBuilder’s own sales efforts, about 80% of the total, plus the revenue from the network of owner affiliated newspapers. Both the softness in employment and the limited opportunity for upsells from the affiliate newspapers, had an impact. However, North American network revenue in the third quarter compared to 2009’s second quarter was unchanged. In addition, revenue generated directly by CareerBuilder was flat from the second quarter to the third quarter of this year. As Craig mentioned, we generated digital revenues company-wide of approximately $228 million in the quarter, and almost $680 million year-to-date. The metrics we track, such as unique visitors, page views, and visits, were all up in the month of September compared to September last year. Drilling down a little bit into the online picture at our community publishing properties, national online revenue was up nicely and online retail revenue, almost 25% of online revenue for U.S. community publishing, was positive. Another important category, automotive, was down in the low-single-digits, and employment, which has historically lagged any recovery, was down significantly. But online revenue excluding employment was actually up in the low single digits. Now let me quickly cover some of the non-operating items and then I will move to our capital structure and balance sheet. The decline in equity income in unconsolidated investees was $6.1 million in the quarter as you saw in the press release. The decline was primarily driven by a $5.4 million non-cash impairment, lower results from our newspaper partnerships, as well as the absence of CareerBuilder results that are now consolidated. However, results for some of our investments improved, particularly at classified ventures. Excluding the non-cash impairment, equity income would have been down about 11%. Moving quickly to the balance sheet, as we mentioned we successfully raised $500 million in the debt market in two tranches of $250 million each. The financing was significantly over-subscribed, priced at the very tight end of price talk, and meaningfully exceeded our initial expectations. As a result, we now have almost a quarter of our debt maturities in the fourth quarter of 2014 and beyond. We used the proceeds of the financing to pay down debt outstanding under our revolving credit agreements and a portion of our term loan that is due in 2011. Additionally, we paid down $197 million of debt during the quarter and reduced debt by over $500 million year-to-date. So at this point, we have about $3.3 billion in debt and our all-in cost of debt is about 4.8%, which includes the cost of the new bonds we just issued. Balances under our revolving credit agreements, which run through 2012, now total approximately $1.6 billion. We have ample capacity under our revolving credit facilities and will generate significant free cash flow to pay our maturities in 2011 and beyond. And as a reminder, we have successfully rolled our revolving credit facilities for well over 30 years. Finally, capital expenditures for the third quarter were $12.5 million and $45.8 million year-to-date. The fourth quarter is typically the largest quarter for CapEx, so we expect to complete the year with CapEx in the $75 million to $85 million range. Keep in mind that amount includes CareerBuilder’s capital expenditures, although they are entirely self-funding. So in summary, we felt good about the quarter. We made a lot of progress on our strategic priorities, in reducing our cost structure and achieving greater efficiencies, and successfully accessing the capital markets. We are seeing some encouraging trends in the market and believe we are solidly positioned going forward. I will stop here and I know Craig and I will be happy now to take your questions. Laura.

(Operator Instructions) Our first question will be from John Janedis with Wells Fargo Securities. John Janedis - Wells Fargo: I know it’s still early but can you talk about what you are seeing from a ratings perspective on your evening news and what impact Leno is having on revenue? And when you look at the 4Q guidance of down low 20s at this point, how different do you think it would be if NBC decided to go with a more traditional schedule? Thanks. Craig A. Dubow: You know, just taking a look first at the programming, my sense of it is that right now we would probably be in a little better position with the traditional prime but it’s awfully early to tell yet and from an overall standpoint, when you take a look at that, I think Leno itself is going to give us some opportunity as we move forward. But taking a look at the news, again what we must do is be certain that we are doing everything we can locally. So it’s again early on all of this to really tell any impacts that we are going to have in that direction but we’ll see where it goes and keep you posted as we move forward.

Your next question comes from the line of Alexia Quadrani with J.P. Morgan. Alexia Quadrani - J.P. Morgan: Thank you and welcome back, Craig. My question is on the cost side -- if you could share with us what your preliminary thinking is on the costs for next year. Is the decline we saw in this quarter a good run-rate for next year? And did you have the furloughs? Did the furloughs continue into Q3 and what are your thoughts going forward? And maybe also touch on the newsprint -- have you stockpiled an above average amount given the possibility of some price increases ahead? Gracia C. Martore: You know, Alexia, it’s a little early for us to comment on the cost side for next year. We are literally just beginning to look at the budgets that are bubbling up from our local units. What I will tell you is that a lot will depend on what the revenue outlook is for next year. I don’t think we assume that the revenue outlook next year is going to be quite as difficult as it was this year but we’ll have to take a look at that and then some of the expense initiatives that we’ve done are ongoing and permanent reductions. We’ll cycle some of those but then there have been new ones, obviously, in July and beyond that will benefit us well into next year. We did not do furloughs in the third quarter nor do we have plans to do furloughs in the fourth quarter, so that about $25 million of expense benefit that we received in the second quarter, and I guess it was about $20 million or so in the first quarter, did not repeat in the third quarter, nor will it repeat in the fourth quarter. On the newsprint side, I would say that we’ve always done a good job on the inventory management side and given where prices are buttressed by some black liquor tax credits that some of the newsprint companies have enjoyed, we certainly have added to our inventory levels, as have others, I’m sure, in the industry. Alexia Quadrani - J.P. Morgan: All right. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Peter Jacobs with Ragen Mackenzie. Peter Jacobs - Ragen Mackenzie Research: Good morning. Just a quick question, and that is could you just update us where you are in your financial covenant ratios, please? Gracia C. Martore: Sure. We will close the third quarter at about 3.03 times and our covenant is 3.5 times max, and as we’ve said previously, we had expected that the covenant would peak in the third quarter although interestingly, it’s not too far -- in fact, I think right on top of where it ended the second quarter and in the fourth quarter, we have about $55 million of severance cash expense that we took in the fourth quarter of last year that won't repeat. So we would anticipate that that ratio would be lower as well in the fourth quarter. Peter Jacobs - Ragen Mackenzie Research: Okay, great. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Alexia Quadrani with J.P. Morgan as a follow-up question. Alexia Quadrani - J.P. Morgan: Just a follow-up question on USA Today -- I may have missed it but what was the circulation revenue in the quarter and are any other ad categories outside from the core travel, are you seeing weakness there as well? Gracia C. Martore: Alexia, with regard to USA Today circulation revenue, I think that Dave Hunkey has indicated that for the full year, circulation revenue is about flat. As you’ll recall, we had a price increase in the fourth quarter of last year so now we are going to be cycling that price increase in the fourth quarter and as well as you know, USA Today circulation has been impacted by the tremendous downturn in travel related and lodging related vacancy levels and just simple lack of traveling and that’s obviously an important component for USA Today but I would add that USA Today continues to be the number one newspaper in print circulation in the country. Our subscription levels were virtually flat in the quarter, despite obviously the impact on single copy and newsstand sales and hotel delivery as a result of the travel impact. And the good news is that we have maintained every single one of our hotel contracts throughout this recession and feel very good about how we are positioned. I will remind you that back after 9/11, our hotel distribution I think back then was off about 30%. And then from September of ’02 to September of ’08, I think our hotel distribution was up about -- a little more than 50%. So we anticipate that as the economy improves and as hotel and airline traffic comes back, that we will see the typical bounce that USA Today has always see in that aftermath of those kinds of events. Craig A. Dubow: Just in addition, two other areas, packaged goods and restaurants, have also had some positive impact during the quarter so there are, in addition to the travel on the negative side, those other areas are certainly working for us and we are looking to seeing that to continue, Alexia. Alexia Quadrani - J.P. Morgan: Thank you.

Your next question comes from Michael Kupinski with Noble Financial Group. Michael Kupinski - Noble Financial Group: Thank you. Sorry for the little background noise and welcome back, Craig. Just -- you may have mentioned this earlier but I was just curious in terms of the regional disparities that you might have in terms of the newspapers, you’ve made mention in the past about some of your most difficult markets, so I was just wondering if you could just talk a little bit about what you are seeing in those difficult markets. Are you seeing in terms of company wide trends, are they in line, are they below? Could you just give us a little bit more color there? Gracia C. Martore: You know, on the regional trends, things have I think evened out a bit but we continue to see, for instance, in a Florida where we have Fort Meyers where there was a huge amount of speculation in secondary, third, fourth homes and folks were speculating, we continue to see obviously tremendous pressures there. Conversely in Bravard, Florida, which is not too too far from Fort Meyers on the other coast, we are actually seeing things, trends abate a little bit in that market. In Phoenix, things are continuing to struggle a bit on the real estate side but I think they’ve done a good job of recasting their structure. So we continue to see in the real estate side the California, Florida, Arizona, Nevada being very difficult but in those other categories, it really is very much a community by community difference. Michael Kupinski - Noble Financial Group: And Gracia, in the past press releases, you indicated that those difficult markets in Florida, Nevada, California, represented a larger percentage of the decline in print, in classifieds. So were they basically in line with the company-wide performance in the quarter or were they still trending well below the company-wide performance? Gracia C. Martore: They still would have trended probably 10 percentage points worse on the real estate vertical than in our other markets but the gap in the other verticals like employment and real estate are not that inconsistent. Michael Kupinski - Noble Financial Group: Okay, terrific. Thank you.

Your next question comes from John [Corright] with Sandler Capital. John Corright - Sandler Capital: Question one -- can you update us on what you see as cash pension contributions, which I think are nothing this year, but ‘010 and ’11? And also, I still think you have something like $1 billion of face value bonds that are due in ’11 and ’12. Have you been buying any of those in or do you plan -- do you think that’s a good idea to buy them in or is all free cash flow simply going to go to reducing the bank debt? Gracia C. Martore: John, on the pension side, as we’ve said, we will not have any mandatory cash contributions in 2009, we will not have any mandatory -- to the best of our knowledge, at this point, given where our pension fund stands -- in 2010. Obviously 2011 and 2012 depend a lot on what assumptions you make on returns, discount rates, employee population, et cetera, et cetera. Our pension plan I think on a preliminary basis is up about 20% or so for the first nine months of this year. A lot will depend on where the market and we end the year and where interest rates are, because that discount rate obviously can have a fairly significant impact on things as well. With respect to the bonds due in ’11 and in ’12, as you may recall we did extend the maturity of some of those ‘11s and ‘12s, I think about over $250 million of those maturities were extended in to 15s and 16s. Obviously we’ll continue to look at things on a very opportunistic basis and if we saw opportunities to do some things to further move maturities around and it made good economic sense for us, then we would do that. I think we have about $740 million of the ‘11s and ‘12s still due in ’11 and ’12 out of the $1 billion that we started with. John Corright - Sandler Capital: Gracia, also while I have you, I know it’s early but if necessary, can you hold CapEx next year to the $80 million type range? I mean, are there any projects that just have to get done next year? Gracia C. Martore: Well, we are just actually finalizing our capital budge and it looks like it will come in in that range and we’ve taken a look at sort of a five-year horizon and we are pretty comfortable that for pure maintenance CapEx plus doing every project that provides a strong ROI, that the $85 million or so, including CareerBuilder, will be a sufficient number for us to continue to grow the strategic part of our business as well as to maintain our existing traditional businesses. We have no big new press projects or any other -- you know, like a DTV conversion, that are on the horizon. Obviously if something like that came up, then that would mean a shift in our thinking but no regulatory issues that we are aware of that would cause us to spend outside of that $85 million range. John Corright - Sandler Capital: Gracia, I just want to say that you and your team have been incredibly nimble in restructuring the balance sheet, because I remember back in -- when you had the New York City analysts luncheon, your bonds were yielding I think over 20% and I couldn’t figure out how you could do any refinancing, and here you are, you’ve done basically $750 million of financing just in the last few months so -- yet you are very light on your feet. Terrific. Gracia C. Martore: Thanks very much. I just need to lose a few pounds, but yeah, thanks. I think we’ve got time for one more -- two more questions.

Your next question comes from Craig Huber, a private investor. Craig Huber - Private Investor: Yes, good morning and welcome back, Craig. Glad to hear your back is doing better. I guess a two- or three-part question. Can you just tell us, Gracia, your daily and Sunday circulation decline in the third quarter, how was that year over year? And then also, this roughly 28% ad revenue decline in the newspapers in the quarter, how much of that would think is from advertising rate as opposed to volume? I think last quarter, you thought it was about 5 percentage points. Gracia C. Martore: Yeah, on the circulation side of things, I think the declines were similar to what we saw in the second quarter and I think at that time, when Bob Dickey talked about it, he mentioned the fact that we’ve taken a number of aggressive pricing actions on virtually every one of our newspapers. We’ve also reduced permanently some of that out of NDM or an area that’s important to our advertisers, so some of that circulation has been moved out. We’ve also seen some morphing to e-editions, like at USA Today and some other things that we are doing. Clearly we are going to be very careful on continued pricing actions and it is not dissimilar to what we’ve seen in the past where when you take aggressive pricing actions, you see a fall-off in circulation and then you spend some money on retention efforts and on start pressure and the like, and that circulation builds back up. But net net, you see the benefit and we continue to see the benefit of those pricing actions in our revenues. As to rate, I don’t think we can probably add much more than what we said on the second quarter earnings call that you know, again rate there’s not on monolithic rate. There’s online products, there are mobile products, there are all kinds of products that are in the mix and you know, in that 5% range, whether it’s give or take a couple of percentage points, hard to hone in particularly and specifically on that, other than to say that I think we are trying to be sensitive to our advertisers and the situations they find themselves in and trying to be more creative with them and helping them get through this difficult economic period for them as well. And then I think we will have tremendously solidified those relationships and as the economy improves, we will see more dollars flow out of them, as we always had hoped. Craig Huber - Private Investor: And Gracia, is that to say the circulation daily was -- I think you said second quarter pretty much it was down in the 11% range -- Gracia C. Martore: It was down in -- yeah, I think it’s in the low- to mid-teens, in that vicinity. Craig Huber - Private Investor: Okay. And then just also, as a point of clarification on CareerBuilder, the numbers you threw out, for the CareerBuilder sales force only generated revenues, how much were those down in the quarter year over year, please? Gracia C. Martore: Year over year in the quarter I think we said that they were down -- let’s see -- CB generated -- they were down about 22% versus the prior year. Craig Huber - Private Investor: Great. Thank you very much.

Your final question comes as a follow-up from John Janedis with Wells Fargo. John Janedis - Wells Fargo: Thanks for taking the follow-up -- just very quickly, for housekeeping, looking out to ‘010 for TV, does the retrans component stay around that $56 million or so, or 14 to 15 per quarter? Or is there another step up there? Craig A. Dubow: There will be some step-ups as we move along, John. John Janedis - Wells Fargo: Significant, Craig, year over year? Or is it more like a CPI number? Craig A. Dubow: Probably more in the CPI range would probably be more realistic? John Janedis - Wells Fargo: Okay. Gracia C. Martore: Well, what do you think CPI is, John? John Janedis - Wells Fargo: I’m not an economist, but not very much. Gracia C. Martore: Well, I think we might do a little better than that. John Janedis - Wells Fargo: Okay, and just on the Olympics front, I think you did $22 million back in ’06. Would you expect any kind of large change from that number, or would it be pretty close, do you think? Craig A. Dubow: You know, it’s a little early yet for us to tell. I think with the time zones, with everything that we’ve got going for us, there may be a possibility but again, we’ve got a lot to look at with the advertisers and where this economy comes back. I don’t think it’s unrealistic but it’s a little early to try and figure that one out entirely yet. John Janedis - Wells Fargo: Okay, thanks. Good luck. Gracia C. Martore: Okay. We can take one last question and then we have to wrap it up.

Our final question comes from Jim Goss with Barrington Research. Jim Goss - Barrington Research: Thank you. I was wondering with the discussion of the e-edition, if you are moving towards the notion of charging for at least some of the premium content and maybe talk about how the considerations might be changing as we move into an era where the debt has to pay for itself as well. And on a corollary, with the -- were you suggesting that the decline in circ at USA Today was basically due to lower occupancy rates at the hotels with whom you have the contracts? Gracia C. Martore: It’s number one, lower vacancy rates at hotels that we have contracts at; number two, it’s lower number of travelers just in general, so airport newsstands, those kinds of things. So it’s a combination I think of all of those factors. Craig, did you want to -- Craig A. Dubow: On the -- Gracia C. Martore: On the daily circ, the first part of the -- Jim Goss - Barrington Research: The charging for premium content issue. Craig A. Dubow: Right. You know, we have been, Jim, as you know looking at this for quite a period of time and strategically, we have lots of considerations on the table. We’re not at this point ready to make any pronouncements as to direction but it’s again, with lots of study, lots of research, and I think what you are seeing us do is really become very customer focused from a content standpoint on what that differentiation will be in really creating value, so it’s something to stay tuned with but we’ve done a lot of research and we are going to continue looking at it. Jim Goss - Barrington Research: Okay, and maybe one last thing -- Craig, do you have any thoughts on the NBC as a cable network? That’s popped up into the whole set of discussions around NBC Universal and even if that would take years to unwind with affiliate relationships, it probably wouldn’t be viewed as a good trend for the largest NBC affiliate group operator. Is there any reality to that whole notion at all and how would you react? Craig A. Dubow: You know, obviously we are not anywhere a part of those discussions but I think your conclusion, it probably wouldn’t be in the very best interest of us from the affiliate standpoint, but we’re just going to have to wait and see. There’s an awful lot going on in those discussions and time will tell and we will respond appropriately at that time. Jim Goss - Barrington Research: Thanks very much. Gracia C. Martore: Laura, I think that concludes our call.

Wonderful, thank you. That concludes today’s conference and thank you for your participation.