eMagin Corporation

eMagin Corporation

$2.07
0.06 (2.99%)
American Stock Exchange
USD, US
Hardware, Equipment & Parts

eMagin Corporation (EMAN) Q4 2016 Earnings Call Transcript

Published at 2017-03-28 11:42:03
Executives
Jeffrey Lucas - CFO Andrew Sculley - CEO
Analysts
Mike Malouf - Craig-Hallum Andrew Uerkwitz - Oppenheimer Dennis Van Zelfden - Brazos Research
Operator
Good morning, and welcome to the eMagin Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2016 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I'd now like to turn the conference over to Jeffrey Lucas, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead, sir.
Jeffrey Lucas
Thanks. Good morning, everyone. We're very glad to have you join us today for our fourth quarter 2016 earnings conference call. During today's call, we may make forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on the company's current expectations, projections, and beliefs, and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Such statements include references to projections of future revenues, plans for product development and production, the company's ability to ramp up production, future contracts, product benefits, operations, liquidity, and capital resources as well as statements containing words like believe, expect, plan, target, et cetera. Our risk factors are included in the company's Form 10-K for 2016 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Friday March 31, 2017. Except where required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to eMagin's Chief Executive Officer, Andrew Sculley. Andrew?
Andrew Sculley
Thank you, Jeff, and good morning everyone. It's been a busy year, and we're very encouraged by the progress we are making in our commercial efforts. As we mentioned in today's press release, we recently signed a multi-million dollar agreement with another major Tier 1 consumer electronics company. This is our third success in 15 months, and while I am not at liberty to disclose any names, I am comfortable telling you that you would easily recognize them all. In addition, we have interest from other parties and will opportunistically continue our dialogs with all of them. It's interesting to note that while some of them are relatively new to us, there are others with whom we have had discussions in the past. Apparently, they went out and researched what they believe to be competing technologies. Recently, they have come back to us only to tell us that our technology is far and beyond anything else available in the marketplace today. So, we are actively reengaging with them as well. In addition, we have signed nondisclosure agreements and are in active discussions with several interested parties and high volume production capabilities in order to meet the commercial market demand. From a revenue perspective, we expect to see improvement in 2017. In the first quarter, we will be recognizing approximately $1.5 million related to these commercial activities. Starting in quarter two, we believe we will begin to recognize revenues related to our recent signed agreement and this will continue for at least the next 12 months. When you combine that with our military business where we expect to have increasing re-incurring [ph] revenue over the next few years, you can get a clear picture of where we are headed and appreciate that commercial is becoming a more important part of our revenue, and one that will continue to grow. While others are attempting to do microdisplays with OLED for AR and VR, we believe that our proprietary direct patterning technology gives an unbeatable advantage in the very high level of brightness needed to satisfy several pending military programs, as well as surpass current consumer HMD threshold requirements. We have made recent enhancements to direct patterning equipment as well as process improvements that are enabling us to reach these high brightness levels, improve display performance, and increase our throughput. As we said in the past, our expertise, know-how, and legacy building low power, high brightness, high resolution microdisplays for the military and industrial markets will enable us to develop best-in-class microdisplays for the rapidly evolving consumer electronics market. Currently, we have shipped limited quantities of our enhanced direct pattern displays to key strategic partners, potential partners, and defense prime contractors; plus to meet expected commercial demand, we must be able to mass produce our proprietary direct pattern next-generation microdisplays. As I noted, we are in discussions with several interested parties to evaluate auctions and recognize that this is another important step for commercialization of our technology. Aside from our achievements with direct patterning, we have continued to develop market-leading products for military and commercial applications. We produced samples of 2K-by-2K, full color RGB micro display to a consumer company at year-end, and product should be available for customers during the second quarter. This is currently our largest microdisplay design, and expands our product offerings for the consumer in commercial marketplaces. As well, we completed the prototyping of a new 0.48 inch diagonal full color XGA format microdisplay targeted at industrial and commercial customers. These are cost-effective medium resolution displays, which we plan to have available in the second quarter. In the industrial market, we delivered an HD plus resolution WUXGA display to a major medical device company for use in their next-generation surgical equipment. Turning to the military, as we mentioned in the release today, we are selected to participate in the U.S. Army's Enhanced Night Vision Goggle 3 or ENVG3 program and the Family of Weapon Sight-Individual, FWS-I Program. Both programs are now in low rate production phases. It is anticipated that these programs will accelerate during 2017, and production will continue to 2020 with potential follow-on orders through 2031. We have completed or on schedule for a number of government-funded programs including the ManTech program from the department of -- secretary of defense. On the product front, we signed a multi-year agreement with a major European defense company with expected sales to exceed $3.5 million through 2018. We are also discussing a new display design to meet future defense system requirements. We delivered displays under a major U.S. Marine Corp contract for a laser range finder program. This contract extends into 2020 and replaces currently fielded equipment. We have worked with the U.S. army and the defense, aviation prime contractor for a potentially higher volume major aircraft helmet modernization program. Finally, the company supplied displays for Trijicon, which has a leading line of thermal weapon sights and thermal monoculars. We continue to work closely with them to offer higher resolution displays for future products. As you know, we recently launched a new consumer product line with two night vision products for the consumer in commercial markets BlazeSpark and BlazeTorch. We are in production with these products and have distributed demo units to prospective customers. We are seeing broader applications for these products than we originally anticipated which may take a little longer and require expanded marketing and promotional efforts. While 2016 was a challenging year for our financial performance, we made great strides in many areas of the business that will serve us well into the future. Our military business will be growing again as new programs begin to ramp up and we work to develop new products for advanced applications. Our direct patterning technology has positioned us as the leading OLED microdisplay company, able to achieve brightness levels that surpass threshold required for virtual and augmented reality as well as the complex cutting-edge requirements for several pending military programs. While we will continue to work with our strategic partners on product designs for commercial prototype displays, we will also be evaluating alternatives with them for mass production to meet future demand. We believe that 2017 will be an important and productive year for us and look forward to updating you on our progress With that, I will hand it over to Jeff for a more detailed look at our quarterly financials.
Jeffrey Lucas
Thank you, Andrew. I'll start with the income statement. Revenue for the full year 2016 was $21.4 million; $3.7 million or 15% lower than the prior year revenue. The fourth quarter contributed to this decline with revenue of $4.6 million, down about 33% from the fourth quarter of 2015. This decline was mainly due to anticipated lower volumes in some of our maturing U.S. military programs. This is consistent with what we've mentioned last quarter it was the driver behind the decline in product revenues in the quarter just ended. We are already benefiting from production ramps from new U.S. military programs. We have seen this impact in the first quarter and expect to see it throughout 2017. We have positioned ourselves a pivotal technology partner for many defense contractors in some of the largest markets in the U.S. night vision and VR-enabled training systems. Additionally, we are witnessing a solid demand for displays before military defense contractors. And very importantly, as Andrew mentioned, we have also signed three agreements with major consumer technology companies that we are very excited about. We will start seeing revenue from our development work going on in this agreements starting in the first quarter of 2017. Focusing on our revenues, product revenue was $3.7 million in the quarter, down 37% compared to last year, but $117,000 higher than the third quarter of this year. The year-over-year decline reflects the maturing of all the defense programs as I just mentioned. R&D contract revenues totaled approximately $905,000, down slightly from the same quarter of 2015, but, up 18% sequentially from this year's third quarter as efforts intensified on our key contracts, including the ManTech contract, which we have been working since 2015. Gross profit for the fourth quarter was $490,000, compared to $904,000 in the fourth quarter of last year, reflecting lower revenues. Gross margins were 10.8% compared to 13% in the same quarter last year. Gross profit on product sales were $304,000 versus $600,000 in the fourth quarter of last year. Gross margin and products sales were 8%, compared to 10% in the same quarter last year. This decline was mainly due to the decrease in product revenues and the impact of lower volumes in our heavily fixed cost nature of our operations. With our fixed manufacturing cost relatively stable, the fewer units produced results in higher fixed cost per unit and lower overall margins. Contract gross profit was $186,000 versus $304,000 in the fourth quarter of last year with the gross margin of 21%. Moving to our expenses; total operating expenses, which includes R&D and SG&A were $4.3 million in the quarter, up $1.3 million or 36% from $3 million a year ago. R&D expenses in the quarter from $1.9 million, a 38% of revenues compared to $1.2 million or 17% revenues from a year ago. The approximate $700,000 increase is due to a lower allocation of R&D cost to R&D contracts. Our direct patterning development efforts and higher spending and development cost associated with our consumer products. SG&A expenses for the quarter total $2.4 million compared with $1.9 million in the same quarter of last year. This year's SG&A included higher non-cash stock compensation charges, cost associated with the launch of our consumer products and non-recurring cost incurred in the consolidation of our financial procurement functions to our corporate manufacturing headquarters here in Hopewell Junction from a former satellite location in Bellevue, Washington. Operating losses for the fourth quarter were $3.8 million versus $2.1 million operating loss in the fourth quarter last year. Net loss for the fourth quarter was $3.5 million or $0.11 per share, compared to $2.1 million or $0.08 per basis share last year. Largely the result of our operating losses, adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and stock compensation or adjusted EBITDAs and the quarter was negative $3.2 million compared to negative $1.6 million in the same quarter last year. This year's adjusted EBITDA include a modestly higher non-cash compensation expense to reflect employee option grants during the year. These grants are made to the employees for their efforts over the past year, and given the many siding and many initiatives ahead of us particularly in our commercial activities for the hard work we have ahead. Turning now to our balance sheet, on December 31, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents of $5.2 million, compared to $9.3 million on December 31 of 2015. The decrease in cash was due primarily to operating losses from the low production volumes, our investment in R&D and the inventory build for our consumer products launch. In December, we ended into a working capital of facility allowing up to $5 million of profitability against our eligible accounts receivable in inventory, which we have $1.9 million outstanding at December 31, 2016. In March, we also put in place a separate $5 million with our largest shareholder to fund our commercialization activity. We feel that we are in a better position entering 2017 in the prior year and are cautiously optimistic about our outlook, given the recent developments most notably sounding a third agreement with another major consumer electronics company has evidenced that our strategy is working. Furthermore, we have already experienced a sizable uptick and new military programs that will also contribute to our revenue in 2017. In closing, I reiterate Andrew's comment that we believe that eMagin is the only company whose OLED micro displays had the brightness and resolution requirement to meet the demand of the market. We are excited about where our positioning is in 2017, our improvement in technology. The evolution of our intellectual capital and the significant interest we are seeing in our products and in our company. We look forward to updating the market on our progress of our company initiatives in the coming months and throughout 2017. So with that, I will turn the call back over to Andrew for final comments before we open the call to questions. Andrew?
Andrew Sculley
Thanks again, Jeff. Before we open the call to questions, I would like to underscore again that we are committed to achieving material and measurable milestones that can drive shareholder value for eMagin. And we believe we are beginning to deliver on these key milestones. We have significantly expanded our addressable market as we move well beyond our core defense markets with growing traction in commercial, industrial and our entry into the consumer market. We are very focused on the progress and discussions with large strategic partners as well as moving our technology into mass production. Our defense business continues to provide a strong foundation for our business and we continue to see ample opportunities with existing and future contract vehicles, which will help us fund advanced technology development to power the next-generation of high performance display technologies. Thank you all for your interest. And with that, we will open it up for questions.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Mike Malouf of Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Please go ahead.
Mike Malouf
Great, guys. Thanks for taking my questions and congratulations on the signing of a new partner.
Andrew Sculley
Thank you.
Jeffrey Lucas
Thanks, Mike.
Mike Malouf
I'm wondering, now that we have three signed, could you just remind us where you are in the process of each. I think you signed your first one early last year, so I'm wondering if you can just kind of summarize that, and also give us a sense of the roadmap of each as you sort of look out over the next year or so?
Andrew Sculley
Just a reminder on the -- when we signed a year ago, essentially was an IP agreement for headset design on IP that we had. So, it's different. And also it had display requirements i.e. that we would supply displays, that's why we did the 2K-by-2K design. Other ones are more interested in what we had started out by talking to a lot of different companies and said, "Look, we are interested in designing the next-generation display for virtual reality and augmented reality," and we proposed a new display to a number of companies, most of which said we'd like to do it on our own with you, i.e. fund you to do it. And so that's where we are actually in one of these companies, and the other one we are working towards that.
Mike Malouf
Okay. And on the -- and which agreement encompasses getting product to the market in the second quarter?
Andrew Sculley
Well, I think that in the second quarter -- in the second quarter we mentioned the 2k-by-2k will be available for customers, right? That would be whomever wants a 2k-by-2k, and that's as I mentioned the -- one year ago; the other ones are product design, it takes a little while to get there, right, that's…
Mike Malouf
Okay. So that's what I was confused in that, so it's the IP agreement that you signed a year ago and that has led to a joint venture or some sort of relationship that allows you to produce for customers?
Andrew Sculley
No, the thing we signed a year ago was for headsets and add a 2k-by-2k desire in the agreement, and we will -- we have produced the 2k-by-2k, and we will have it available for customers in the second quarter, but there is no joint venture or anything like that associated with it.
Mike Malouf
So, are those two separate statements or are they tied in some way?
Andrew Sculley
Well, should that -- I can't tell you that customer will or will not buy displays, but should they buy displays, then we have them available, and they are….
Mike Malouf
Okay, great. So, when you take a look at some of the chatter in the market, you know, one of the biggest representatives of AMD, Roy Taylor has talked about working with you in August of last year, and again in September of last year at Diaz [ph] and has been working with you for 18 months, so obviously you've only been working with one agreement for 18 months, so it's hard to not say that it's not AMD. And on April 12, he is going to give the keynote at the Virtual Reality World Congress and has tweeted that he is about to announce something pretty amazing and surprise people. What do you think of that as an opportunity for you guys?
Andrew Sculley
I can't tell you that we are working or not working with Roy. On the other hand, great announcements in the ARVR space, is great for everyone. We really want to see this takeoff obviously.
Jeffrey Lucas
And we are just in a position, Michael, we really can't comment on that.
Mike Malouf
Okay, great. Thanks for taking my questions.
Andrew Sculley
Okay.
Operator
The next question comes from Andrew Uerkwitz of Oppenheimer & Company. Please go ahead.
Andrew Uerkwitz
Hey, thanks gentlemen for taking my call. On these agreements, are they far enough along where we could see other OpEx requirement -- OpEx increase requirements or the capital requirements you guys need to fulfill to move these projects along at all?
Andrew Sculley
For capital requirements at this point; think of this, if we were working with you about a new display design, the first step is to design the silicon for the display, and that's why we said that we could recognize revenue over 12 months, that's what that is, but in order to mass produce something like this, we have to be working on the next-generation low rate production line at the same time.
Jeffrey Lucas
But Andrew, also to supplement they have response there. We've been making investments in our OpEx and very important in our R&D activity for the past year, if you look at our operating expense structure you see it's gone up and it's gone up in anticipation and contemplation of this. So we don't envision dramatic increase at this year, I think you've seen some pretty sizable ones last year reflective of our preparation in this area.
Andrew Uerkwitz
Great. Thanks, I appreciate the color. And then, on the military side, should we start to expect a significant ramp, or just a ramp throughout 2017 to some of these newer contracts start to -- you know, get to full production?
Andrew Sculley
No, the military doesn't normally jump up, it would be a ramp in terms of -- we are supplying for the first display or we are supplying the displays for the first headset et cetera to be put into service and as that you know, we will ramp overtime.
Jeffrey Lucas
Andrew, the volumes we are seeing here are pretty impressive. The challenge of course the military contracts and program, it happens over a long period of time. We are at low rate production volume to allow this plug-and-play now. And we are seeing those numbers increase, but these things don't takeoff too steep on incline initially, but we are seeing a pretty solid ramps over the next several months; pretty exciting.
Andrew Uerkwitz
Okay, great. Appreciate the color, gentlemen. Thank you very much.
Andrew Sculley
Sure.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Dennis Van Zelfden of Brazos Research. Please go ahead.
Dennis Van Zelfden
Thank you. Good morning, Andrew and Jeff.
Jeffrey Lucas
Good morning.
Dennis Van Zelfden
I was wondering if the 1.5 million you are going to book in the first quarter from these development contracts; is that something we should see every quarter this year, the amount?
Jeffrey Lucas
Well, we are always very careful in terms of how much actually share with these three, but you are going to see revenues associated with the development work for the next several months actually for several quarters as Andrew pointed out. There is a lot of effort that goes into actually developing a prototype display. And, a lot of efforts, so there will be lot revenue that will be associated with it. So, you will continue to see that again for the next several quarters at least.
Dennis Van Zelfden
Okay. I guess what I really mean is is it at that level or is it going to be lumpy?
Andrew Sculley
Well, will not be necessarily at that level for all the quarters.
Jeffrey Lucas
But there may be some lumpiness to it. And part of the lumpiness just to let you know is as we are working with these companies, their requirements changes and the scope of the work changes. So, you will have a little variability as a result of that. Often that variability of course is on the upside from what our original expectations may be because of this general growth and the scope of the work that we are doing with them.
Dennis Van Zelfden
Okay. Regarding the potential high volume manufacturing partner, are you close to that? Or, when do you expect to maybe have something in place?
Andrew Sculley
It requires two things. One is because the market is very early, the high volume manufacturing partner requires a customer. And so we have a little bit of a challenge. Now we do have three way NDAs, but we have a challenge to bring the customer and the manufacturing partner together and we are working with a couple.
Jeffrey Lucas
I think we will be a little cautious never saying we are getting close. We have been in discussion with these folks quite a while. They are large companies, large players, with their own level of administrative and bureaucratic complexity. These things don't happen quickly. And even when we think we are getting very close in something, invariably another element can come into play. So we are -- I will say, this we are making solid forward progress with these folks, but we're not in a position nor we would be able to say it's going to happen soon or in the very near future or in the later future. And it could happen relatively quickly, but there are so many variables involved here that we are just a little cautious here in terms of setting any specific timeline expectations.
Dennis Van Zelfden
Okay. Thank you very much. Good luck.
Jeffrey Lucas
Thank you.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Seeing no further questions, this concludes our question-and answer-session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Andrew Sculley for any closing remarks.
Andrew Sculley
I want to thank everyone for joining us on the call and thank you for your support. It is a very exciting time for us and to agreements to generate the next generation display and work with mass production partners, talk with them who are very interested and taking this to the next level, it's exciting. So, I thank you and the eMagin team very much.
Jeffrey Lucas
And let me just add that we've been working this for a long time and we are now at a very, very exciting juncture. We feel for the company overall. We appreciate the patience that you as investors have shown with us. And we are working diligently to certainly earn that. Thank you.
Andrew Sculley
Thank you all.
Operator
The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines. Have a great day.